David Evans

and 3 more

Reconstructing past changes in global mean surface temperature (GMST) is one of the key contributions that palaeoclimate science can make in addressing societally relevant questions and is required to determine equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). Previous work has suggested that the temperature of the deep ocean (Td) can be used to determine GMST with a simple Td-GMST scaling factor of 1 prior to the Pliocene. However, this metric lacks a robust mechanistic basis, and indeed, such a relationship is intuitively difficult to envisage given that polar amplification is a ubiquitous feature of past warm climate states and deep water overwhelmingly forms at high latitudes. Here, we interrogate whether and crucially, why, this relationship exists using a suite of curated data compilations generated for key deep-time climate intervals as well as two independent sets of palaeoclimate model simulations. We show that models and data are in full agreement that a 1:1 relationship is a good approximation. Mechanistically, both sets of climate models suggest that i) increasingly seasonally biased deep water formation, and ii) a faster rate of land versus ocean surface warming are the two processes that act to counterbalance a possible polar amplification-derived bias on Td-derived GMST. Using this knowledge, we interrogate the quality of the existing deep ocean temperature datasets and provide a new Cenozoic record of GMST. Our estimates are substantially warmer than similar previous efforts for much of the Paleogene and are thus consistent with a substantially higher-than-modern ECS during deep-time high CO2 climate states.

Yvan Malo Romé

and 4 more

Our limited understanding of millennial-scale variability in the context of the last glacial period can be explained by the lack of a reliable modelling framework to study abrupt climate changes under realistic glacial backgrounds. In this article, we describe a new set of long-run Last Glacial Maximum experiments where such climate shifts were triggered by different snapshots of ice-sheet meltwater derived from the early stages of the last deglaciation. Depending on the location and the magnitude of the forcing, we observe three distinct dynamical regimes and highlight a subtle window of opportunity where the climate can sustain oscillations between cold and warm modes. We identify the European-Arctic and Nordic Seas regions as being most sensitive to meltwater discharge in the context of switching to a cold mode, compared to freshwater fluxes from the Laurentide ice sheets. These cold climates follow a consistent pattern in temperature, sea ice and convection, and are largely independent from freshwater release as a result of effective AMOC collapse. Warm modes, on the other hand, show more complexity in their response to the regional pattern of the meltwater input, and within them, we observe significant differences linked to the reorganisation of deep water formation sites and the subpolar gyre. Broadly, the main characteristics of the oscillations, obtained under full-glacial conditions with realistically low meltwater discharge, are comparable to δ18O records of the last glacial period, although our simplified experiment design prevents detailed conclusions from being drawn on whether these represent actual Dansgaard-Oeschger events.