Climatic warming is predicted to affect high-latitude habitats, such as boreal peatlands, at a larger magnitude than the global average. The controls on the breakdown of organic matter in peatlands are complex; it’s unclear how climatic warming will affect the stability of the large carbon pool that’s currently stored in peatlands. To investigate this, we collected soil cores from three boreal habitats along a hydrological transect (Bog, Intermediate, and Upland Forest) in Finland, and incubated ex-situ for 140 days. Each soil horizon was incubated in three temperatures (0°C, 4°C, 20°C). Here, we found the Intermediate site had the largest CO2 production considering the entirety of the soil column (per gram dry weight). Statistical analysis found that sample C content was the most indicative independent variable to predict sample CO2 production. Each soil horizon displayed a different magnitude of response to the temperature incubations (Q10s ranged from 0.60-2.33), and through microbial relative abundance analysis we found that the microbial community structure had significant differences between both habitat and depth of sample origin. Coupling these methods, and the fine scale of the both vertical (soil column horizons) and horizontal (along a hydrological gradient through distinct habitats) transects gives us a novel perspective on the controls of microbial respiration rates. Our results stress that large scale modeling efforts of carbon dynamics should prioritize both soil carbon quantity and quality.

Gustaf Hugelius

and 42 more

The long-term net sink of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the northern permafrost region is projected to weaken or shift under climate change. But large uncertainties remain, even on present-day GHG budgets. We compare bottom-up (data-driven upscaling, process-based models) and top-down budgets (atmospheric inversion models) of the main GHGs (CO2, CH4, and N2O) and lateral fluxes of C and N across the region over 2000-2020. Bottom-up approaches estimate higher land to atmosphere fluxes for all GHGs compared to top-down atmospheric inversions. Both bottom-up and top-down approaches respectively show a net sink of CO2 in natural ecosystems (-31 (-667, 559) and -587 (-862, -312), respectively) but sources of CH4 (38 (23, 53) and 15 (11, 18) Tg CH4-C yr-1) and N2O (0.6 (0.03, 1.2) and 0.09 (-0.19, 0.37) Tg N2O-N yr-1) in natural ecosystems. Assuming equal weight to bottom-up and top-down budgets and including anthropogenic emissions, the combined GHG budget is a source of 147 (-492, 759) Tg CO2-Ceq yr-1 (GWP100). A net CO2 sink in boreal forests and wetlands is offset by CO2 emissions from inland waters and CH4 emissions from wetlands and inland waters, with a smaller additional warming from N2O emissions. Priorities for future research include representation of inland waters in process-based models and compilation of process-model ensembles for CH4 and N2O. Discrepancies between bottom-up and top-down methods call for analyses of how prior flux ensembles impact inversion budgets, more in-situ flux observations and improved resolution in upscaling.

Justine Lucile Ramage

and 19 more