We characterize the vortex and dust devil activity at Jezero from pressure and winds obtained with the MEDA instrument on Mars 2020 over 415 sols (Ls=6-213º). Vortices are abundant (4.9 vortices per sol with pressure drops >0.5 Pa when correcting from gaps in coverage) and peak at noon. At least one in every 5 vortices carries dust from RDS-MEDA data, and intense vortices are more likely to carry dust. Seasonal variability was small but dust devils were abundant during a dust storm (Ls=152-156º). Vortices are more frequent and intense over terrains with lower thermal inertia favoring a higher daytime surface-to-air temperature gradient. We fit measurements of wind and pressure during dust devil encounters to models of vortices, and investigate their physical characteristics. Diameters range from 5 to 135 m with a mean of 20 m. Three 100-m size events passed within 30 m of the rover. From the close encounters we estimate a dust devil activity of 2.0-3.0 dust devils km$^{-2}$ sol$^{-1}$. A comparison of MEDA observations with a Large Eddy Simulation of Jezero at Ls=45º produces a similar result. We estimate that large dust devils with diameters $>100$ m have a density of 0.1 dust devils km-2sol-1, implying that dust lifting is dominated by the largest vortices in the region. At least one vortex had a central pressure drop of 9.0 Pa and internal winds of 25 ms-1. The MEDA wind sensors were partially damaged during two dust devil encounters, and we detail these events.

Mars 2020 Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer (MEDA) instrument data acquired during half of a martian year (Ls 13º-180º), and modeling efforts with the Mars Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (MRAMS) and Mars Climate Database (MCD) allow us to study the seasonal evolution and variability of nocturnal atmospheric turbulence at Jezero crater. Nighttime conditions in Mars’s Planetary Boundary Layer are highly stable because of strong radiative cooling that efficiently inhibits convection. However, MEDA nighttime observations of simultaneous, rapid fluctuations in horizontal wind speed and air temperatures suggest the development of nighttime turbulence in Jezero crater. Mesoscale modeling with MRAMS also shows a similar pattern and enables us to investigate the origins of this turbulence and the mechanisms at play. As opposed to Gale crater, less evidence of turbulence from breaking mountain/gravity wave activity was found in Jezero during the period studied with MRAMS. On the contrary, the model suggests that nighttime turbulence at Jezero crater is explained by mechanical turbulence produced by increasingly strong wind shear related to the development of a bore-like disturbance at the nocturnal inversion interface. The enhanced wind shear leads to a reduction in the Ri and an onset of mechanical turbulence. Once the critical Richardson Number is reached (Ri ∼< 0.25), shear instabilities can mix warmer air aloft down to the surface.