Zoe Amie Pierrat

and 12 more

The ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS) collects thermal observations from the International Space Station to support evapotranspiration (ET) research at fine spatial resolutions (70 m x 70 m). Initial ET estimates from ECOSTRESS Collection 1 have been used in a wide range of scientific studies and applications, though subsequent analyses identified areas for improvement. This study provides an overview of updates to ECOSTRESS Collection 2 ET and presents an accuracy assessment of ET and auxiliary variables against in situ data from AmeriFlux. Key updates in Collection 2 include: four independent model estimates of ET and improved auxiliary forcing data. We find the multi-model ensemble ET estimate achieves a root mean square error (RMSE) of 109 Wm-2 for instantaneous observations and 1.5 mm/day for daily retrievals. When considering uncertainty in energy balance closure approaches for site-level data, the RMSE improves to 48 Wm-2 for instantaneous ET. We observe variable performance based on time of day of ECOSTRESS image acquisition, climate and vegetation type. Evaluation of auxiliary data highlight limitations in down-scaled net radiation and relative humidity, contributing to a diurnal hysteresis in ET estimates. We provide accuracy metrics and model sensitivity to auxiliary data to facilitate user confidence, data adoption, interpretation, and applications. ECOSTRESS is the only instrument capable of providing ET at different times of day at high spatial scales; thus, this work is an important step toward enhancing the capabilities of satellite-driven ET models in resolving diurnal ET variations and guiding directions for future improvements.

Tian Hu

and 17 more

The ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS) is a scientific mission that collects high spatio-temporal resolution (~70 m, 1-5 days average revisit time) thermal images since its launch on 29 June 2018. As a predecessor of future missions, one of the main objectives of ECOSTRESS is to retrieve and understand the spatio-temporal variations in terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) and its responses to soil water availability. In the European ECOSTRESS Hub (EEH), by taking advantage of land surface temperature retrievals, we generated ECOSTRESS ET products over Europe and Africa using three structurally contrasting models, namely Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) and Two Source Energy Balance (TSEB) parametric models, as well as the non-parametric Surface Temperature Initiated Closure (STIC) model. A comprehensive evaluation of the EEH ET products was conducted with respect to flux measurements from 19 eddy covariance sites over 6 different biomes with diverse aridity levels. Results revealed comparable performances of STIC and SEBS (RMSE of ~70 W m-2). However, the relatively complex TSEB model produced a higher RMSE of ~90 W m-2. Comparison between STIC ET estimate and the operational ECOSTRESS ET product from NASA PT-JPL model showed a difference in RMSE between the two ET products around 50 W m-2. Substantial overestimation (>80 W m-2) was noted in PT-JPL ET estimates over shrublands and savannas presumably due to the weak constraint of LST in the model. Overall, the EEH is promising to serve as a support to the Land Surface Temperature Monitoring (LSTM) mission.

John Volk

and 23 more

OpenET is a software system that makes satellite-based multi-model estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) accessible at multiple spatial and temporal scales over the U.S. Large-scale ET estimates fill a critical data-gap for irrigation management, water resources management, and hydrological modeling and research. We present the methods and results of the second phase of an intercomparison and accuracy assessment between OpenET satellite-based models (ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, PT-JPL, geeSEBAL, SIMS and SSEBop) and a benchmark ground-based ET dataset with data from nearly 200 eddy covariance towers across the contiguous U.S. Processing steps for the benchmark dataset included gap-filling, energy balance closure correction, calculation of closed and unclosed daily ET, and multiple levels of data QA/QC. The dataset was split into three groups, phase I and II of the intercomparison and a reserve dataset for future studies. To sample satellite-based ET pixels, static flux footprints were generated at each station based on dominant wind speed and direction. Where data allowed, two dimensional flux footprints that are weighted by hourly ETo were developed and used for ET pixel sampling. A wide range of visual and statistical comparisons between satellite and ground-based ET were conducted at each station and against stations grouped by land cover type. Based on key performance metrics including bias, coefficient of determination, and root mean square error, model results show promising agreement at many flux sites considering the inherent uncertainty in station data. Remote sensing models show the highest agreement with closed station ET in irrigated annual cropland settings whereas locations of native vegetation with high aridity and some forested stations show relatively less agreement. The benchmark ET dataset was used to explore different approaches to computing a single ensemble estimate from the six model ensemble, with the goal of reducing the influence of model outliers and selection of weighting and data sampling schemes to reduce the influence of flux stations with sparse or extensive data records. We present the results from the model intercomparison and accuracy assessment and discuss model performance relative to accuracy requirements from the OpenET user community.