Joonas Leino

and 7 more

Cyclic absorption of solar radiation generates oscillations in atmospheric fields. These oscillations are called atmospheric or thermal tides, which are furthermore modified by topography and surface properties. This leads to a complex mix of sun-synchronous and non sun-synchronous tides that propagate around the planet eastward and westward. This study focuses on analyzing the ter-diurnal component (period of 8 hr) from surface pressure observations by Mars Science Laboratory (MSL), InSight, Viking Lander (VL) 1, and VL2. General Circulation Model (GCM) results are used to provide a global context for interpreting the observed ter-diurnal tide properties. MSL and InSight have a clear and similar seasonal cycle, with local amplitude peaks at around solar longitude (Ls) 60◦ , Ls 130◦ and Ls 320◦ . The amplitude peak at Ls 320◦ is related to the annual dust storm, while the dust storm around Ls 230◦ is not detected by either platforms. During the global dust storms, MSL, VL1, and VL2 detect their highest amplitudes. GCM predicts the weakest amplitudes at the equinoxes, while the strongest ones are predicted in summertime for both hemispheres. GCM amplitudes are typically lower than observed, but match better during the aphelion season. During this time, model results suggest that the two most prominent modes are the sun-synchronous ter-diurnal tide (TW3) and an eastward propagating resonantly-enhanced Kelvin wave (TE3). Simulations with and without the effect of radiative heating by water ice clouds indicate the clouds may play a significant role in forcing the ter-diurnal tide during northern hemisphere summer season.

Lucas Lange

and 11 more

Observations of the South Polar Residual Cap suggest a possible erosion of the cap, leading to an increase of the global mass of the atmosphere. We test this assumption by making the first comparison between Viking 1 and InSight surface pressure data that have been recorded with ~40 years of difference. Such a comparison also allows us to determine changes in the dynamics of the seasonal ice caps between these two periods. To do so, we first had to recalibrate the InSight pressure data because of their unexpected sensitivity to the sensor temperature. Then, we had to design a procedure to compare distant pressure measurements. We propose two surface pressure interpolation methods at the local and global scale to do the comparison. The comparison of Viking and InSight seasonal surface pressure variations does not show major changes in the CO2 cycle. Such conclusions are also supported by an analysis of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) pressure data. Further comparisons with images of the south seasonal cap taken by the Viking 2 orbiter and MARCI camera do not display significant changes in the dynamic of this cap within ~40 years. Only a possible larger extension of the North Cap after the global storm of MY 34 is observed, but the physical mechanisms behind this anomaly are not well determined. Finally, the first comparison of MSL and InSight pressure data suggests a pressure deficit at Gale crater during southern summer, possibly resulting from a large presence of dust suspended within the crater.

Ricardo Hueso

and 33 more

Serina Diniega

and 4 more

Since 2001, the Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG) has maintained a document outlining community consensus priorities for scientific goals, objectives, and investigations for the robotic and human exploration of Mars [1]. This “Goals Document” is a living document that is revised regularly (~every few years) in light of new Mars science results. It is organized into a hierarchy of goals, objectives, and investigations. The four Goals are not prioritized and are organized around major areas of scientific knowledge: “Life”, “Climate”, “Geology”, and “Preparation for Human Exploration”. Don Banfield is the current MEPAG Goals Committee Chair, and he oversees 2-3 representatives per Goal [2]. The most recent round of revisions (2018) was prompted by discussion at the 6th International Mars Polar Science and Exploration Conference (held in 2016 in Reykjavik, Iceland [3]), which pointed out that current high-priority Polar Science and Present-Day Activity questions were not well represented in content or priorities within the 2015 Goals Document. Upon request from the MEPAG Executive and Goals Committees [2], specific areas of disconnect were highlighted by representatives of the Mars Polar Science community; these were evaluated by the Goals Committee who proposed changes at sub-objective and investigation levels within the Climate and Geology Goals. These proposed changes were open for comment by the larger Mars community for 6 weeks, and then finalized. The official MEPAG 2018 Goals Document will be presented at the meeting. Additionally, the presentation will describe plans for the next round of revisions, which are expected to primarily come out of the presentations and discussion at the 9th International Conference on Mars (to be held at Caltech, Pasadena, CA in July 2019 [4]), and which are expected to include reference to returned sample science. The 2019 MEPAG Goals Document will form an important input to the next Planetary Science Decadal Survey [5]. [1] https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/reports.cfm?expand=science [2] https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/about.cfm [3] https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/marspolar2016/ [4] https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/ninthmars2019/ [5] NASEM, 2017. CAPS: Getting Ready for the Next Planetary Science Decadal Survey. https://doi.org/10.17226/24843.
Seismic observations involve signals that can be easily masked by noise injection. For InSight, NASA's lander on Mars, the atmosphere is a significant noise contributor for two thirds of a Martian day, and while the noise is below that seen at even the quietest sites on Earth, the amplitude of seismic signals on Mars is also considerably lower requiring an understanding and quantification of environmental injection at unprecedented levels. Mars' ground and atmosphere provide a continuous coupled seismic system, and although atmospheric functions are of distinct origins, the superposition of these noise contributions is poorly understood, making separation a challenging task. We present a novel method for partitioning the observed signal into seismic and environmental contributions. Pressure and wind fluctuations are shown to exhibit temporal cross-frequency coupling across multiple bands, injecting noise that is neither random nor coherent. We investigate this through comodulation, quantifying the signal synchrony in seismic motion, wind and pressure. By working in the time-frequency domain, we discriminate the origins of underlying processes and provide the site's environmental sensitivity. Our method aims to create a virtual vault at InSight, shielding the seismometers with effective post-processing in lieu of a physical vault. This allows us to describe the environmental and seismic signals over a sequence of sols, to quantify the wind and pressure injection, and estimate the seismic content of possible Marsquakes with a signal-to-noise ratio that can be quantified in terms of environmental independence. Finally, we exploit the temporal energy correlations for source attribution of our observations.