A document by Shiqi Fang. Click on the document to view its contents.

Most of the world’s population faces freshwater scarcity threats, and reservoirs, built both for ensuring water supply during prolonged droughts and reducing downstream flood risks, are critical infrastructure for water sustainability. Historical inflow data and water demand were used to estimate reservoir storage allocation and operation policies when designing and building reservoirs, 50 to 100 years ago. This study assesses historical reservoir operations in 16 Southeastern reservoirs and evaluates the potential for utilizing existing flood control storage for alternative purposes without increasing downstream flood risk. Using a reservoir simulation model, we evaluate the resulting storage under four initial storage conditions for observed and synthetic seasonal maximum six-day flood pulses. For most reservoirs, we find conservation storage is depleting and did not exceed the flood storage capacity in their historical operation. The simulation model resulted in most of the reservoirs’ storage levels staying within the flood control pool for all scenarios (for observed and synthetic floods). Additional flood risk was lowest for initial storage condition 1 (flood control pool empty) and highest with condition 2 (50% of the flood control pool full). Flood risk increased the most for reservoirs with small ratios of flood control to conservation pool storage. Our study shows the potential for reallocation and utilization of flood control storage to meet the increasing demand. As limited opportunities for new reservoirs exist, utilizing current reservoir storage without introducing additional downstream risk may be an effective management strategy to mitigate flood and drought risk under climate change and population growth.

Inflow anomalies at varying temporal scales, seasonally varying storage mandates, and multi-purpose allocation requirements contribute to reservoir operational decisions. The difficulty of capturing these constraints across many basins in a generalized framework has limited the accuracy of streamflow estimates in Land Surface Models for locations downstream of reservoirs. We develop a Piece Wise Linear Regression Tree to learn generalized daily operating policies from 76 reservoirs from four major basins across the coterminous US. Reservoir characteristics, such as residence time and maximum storage, and daily state variables, such as storage and inflow, are used to group similar observations across all reservoirs. Linear regression equations are then fit between daily state variables and release for each group. We recommend two models – Model 1 (M1) that performs the best when simulating untrained records but is complex, and Model 2 (M2) that is nearly as performant as M1 but more parsimonious. The simulated release median root mean squared error is 49.7% (53.2%) of mean daily release with a median Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency of 0.62 (0.52) for M1 (M2). Long-term residence time is shown to be useful in grouping similar operating reservoirs. Release from low residence time reservoirs can be mostly described using inflow-based variables. Operations at higher residence time reservoirs are more related to previous release variables or storage variables, depending on the current inflow. The ability of the models presented to capture operational dynamics of many types of reservoirs indicates their potential to be used for untrained and limited data reservoirs.

Climate elasticity of streamflow represents a nondimensional measure of the sensitivity of streamflow to climatic factors. Estimation of such elasticities from observational records has become an important alternative to scenario-based methods of evaluating streamflow sensitivity to climate. Nearly all previous elasticity studies have used a definition of elasticity known as arc elasticity, which measures changes in streamflow about mean values of streamflow and climate. Using observational records in western U.S., our findings reveal that elasticity definitions based on power law models lead to both regional and basin specific estimates of elasticity which are physically more realistic than estimates based on arc elasticity. Evaluating the ability of arc and power law elasticity estimators in reproducing Dooge’s complementary relationship (DCR) between potential evapotranspiration and precipitation elasticities reveal that power law elasticities estimated from at-site, panel and hierarchical statistical models reproduce DCR, whereas corresponding estimators based on arc elasticity cannot reproduce DCR. Importantly, our regional elasticity formulations using either panel and/or hierarchical formulations led to estimates of both regional and basin specific estimates of elasticities, enabling and contrasting streamflow sensitivity to climate across both basins and regions.

With an increasing number of continental-scale hydrologic models, the ability to evaluate performance is key to understanding uncertainty in prediction and making improvements to the model(s). In 2016, the NOAA National Water Model (NWM) was put into operations to improve the spatial and temporal resolution of hydrologic prediction in the U.S. Here, we evaluate the NWM 2.0 historical streamflow record in natural and controlled basins using the Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency metric decomposed into relative error, conditional, and unconditional bias. Each of these is evaluated in the contexts of categorized meteorologic, landscape, and anthropogenic characteristics to assess model performance and diagnose error types. Broadly speaking greater rainfall and snow coverage leads to improved performance while larger potential evapotranspiration (PET), aridity, and phase correlation reduce performance. More rainfall and phase correlation reduce overall bias, while increasing PET, aridity, snow coverage/fraction increase model bias. With respect to landscape traits, more barren and agricultural land yeild improved performance while more forest, shrubland, grassland and imperviousness tend to decrease performance. Lastly, more barren and herbaceous land tend to decrease bias, while greater imperviousness, urban, forest, and shrubland cover increase bias. The insights gained can help identify key hydrological factors in NWM predictions; enforce the need for regionalized physics and modeling; and help develop hybid post-processing methods to improve prediction. Finally, we demonstrate how the NOAA Next Generation Water Resource Modeling Framework can help reduce the structural bias through the application of heterogenous model processes and highlight opportunities for ongoing development and evaluation.

Precipitation forecasts, particularly at subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) time scale, are essential for informed and proactive water resources management. Although S2S precipitation forecasts have been evaluated, no systematic decomposition of the skill, Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) coefficient, has been analyzed towards understanding the forecast accuracy. We decompose the NSE of S2S precipitation forecast into its three components – correlation, conditional bias, and unconditional bias – by four seasons, three lead times (1–12-day, 1-22 day, and 1-32 day), and three models (ECMWF, CFS, NCEP) over the Conterminous United States (CONUS). Application of dry mask is critical as the NSE and correlation are lower across all seasons after masking areas with low precipitation values. Further, a west-to-east gradient in S2S forecast skill exists and forecast skill was better during the winter months and for areas closer to the coast. Overall, ECMWF’s model performance was stronger than both ECCC and NCEP CFS’s performance, mainly for the forecasts issued during fall and winter months. However, ECCC and NCEP CFS performed better for the forecast issued during the spring months, and also performed better in in-land areas. Post-processing using simple Model Output Statistics could reduce both unconditional and conditional bias to zero, thereby offering better skill for regimes with high correlation. Our decomposition results also show efforts should focus on improving model parametrization and initialization schemes for climate regimes with low correlation values.

Floods cause hundreds of fatalities and billions of dollars of economic loss each year in the United States. To mitigate these damages, accurate flood prediction is needed for issuing early warnings to the public. This situation is exacerbated in larger model domains for high flows, particularly in ungauged basins. To improve flood prediction for both gauged and ungauged basins, we propose a spatio-temporal hierarchical model (STHM) to improve high flow estimation using a 10-day window of modeled National Water Model (NWM) streamflow and a variety of catchment characteristics as input. The STHM is calibrated (1993-2008) and validated (2009-2018) in controlled, natural, and coastal basins over three broad groups, and shows significant improvement for the first two basin types. A seasonal analysis shows the most influential predictors are the previous 3-day average streamflow and the aridity index for controlled and natural basins, respectively. To evaluate the STHM in improving streamflow in ungauged basins, 20-fold cross-validation is performed by leaving 5% of sites. Results show that the STHM increases predictive skill in over 50% of sites by 0.1 Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and improves over 65% of sites’ streamflow prediction to an NSE>0.67, which demonstrates that the STHM is one of the first of its kind and could be employed for flood prediction in both gauged and ungauged basins.

Climate variability, in terms of the climatic fluctuations in precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, impacts the variability of runoff at different timescales. This paper developed a new daily water balance model which unifies the probability distributed model and the SCS curve number method, and provides a unified framework for water balances across different timescales. The model uses a daily step but can be forced with climate inputs varying at different timescales. The model is applied to 82 MOPEX catchments, and the runoff at a coarser timescale is aggregated from the daily runoff. For runoff at each timescale, the relative role of each climate variability (daily, monthly, or inter-annual variability) is evaluated by comparing the modeled runoff forced with the climate variability at two consecutive timescales. It is found that the runoff variability at the daily, monthly, and annual scale is primarily controlled by the climate variability at the same timescale. The monthly climate variability significantly contributes to both the daily and inter-annual runoff variability. However, both daily and inter-annual climate variability play much smaller roles in monthly runoff variability. Besides monthly climate variability, mean annual runoff receives considerable contribution from the inter-annual climatic variability, which is often disregarded in previous studies. The quantitative evaluation of the roles of climate variability reveals how climate controls runoff across different timescales.

Understanding the flood generating mechanisms that influence flood seasonality in a region provides information on setting up relevant contingency measures. While former studies had estimated flood seasonality at regional/continental scale, limited/no studies had investigated the climate/basin drivers that influence the changes in flood seasonality. Considering this, the current study performed two analysis i) estimated the changes in the seasonality of annual maximum floods (AMF) between pre- and post-1970 across Hydroclimate Data Network basins over the coterminous United States, and ii) identified the predictors that influence the change in the seasonality from a set of climate and geomorphic variables. Significant changes in the AMF seasonality were noted for approximately half of the basins in the eastern US while low to no change was found in a majority of the basins in the central/western US. We found that a decrease (increase) in the seasonality index, indicating floods arriving more uniformly (more concentrated in time), is typically associated with an increase in the precipitation (temperature) in basins where a strong change in flood seasonality occurs. Elevation has a more dominant role as compared to the drainage area in changing the flood seasonality as the former affects the form of precipitation in basins in higher elevations. This is particularly true for western US where floods arrive more distributed over the year (i.e., decrease in flood seasonality index), which potentially indicates increased warming resulting in early snowmelt.