Deep learning (DL) phase picking models have proven effective in processing large volumes of seismic data, including successfully detecting earthquakes missed by other standard detection methods. Despite their success, the applicability of existing extensively-trained DL models to high-frequency borehole datasets is currently unclear. In this study, we compare four established models (GPD, U-GPD, PhaseNet and EQTransformer) trained on regional earthquakes recorded at surface stations (100 Hz) in terms of their picking performance on high-frequency borehole data (2000 Hz) from the Preston New Road (PNR) unconventional shale gas site, in the United Kingdom (UK). The PNR-1z dataset, which we use as a benchmark, consists of continuously recorded waveforms containing over 38,000 seismic events previously catalogued, ranging in magnitudes from -2.8 to 1.1. Remarkably, three of the four DL models recall a good fraction of the events and two might satisfy the monitoring requirements of some users without any modifications. In particular, PhaseNet and U-GPD demonstrate exceptional recall rates of 95% and 76.6%, respectively, and detect a substantial number of new events (over 15,800 and 8,300 events, respectively). PhaseNet’s success might be attributed to its exposure to more extensive and diverse instrument dataset during training, as well as its relatively small model size, which might mitigate overfitting to its training set. U-GPD outperforms PhaseNet during periods of high seismic rates due to its smaller window size (400-samples compared to PhaseNet’s 3000-sample window). All models start missing events below M_w -0.5, suggesting that the models could benefit from additional training with microseismic datasets. Nonetheless, PhaseNet may satisfy some users' monitoring requirements without further modification, detecting over 52,000 events at PNR. This suggests that DL models can provide efficient solutions to the big data challenge of downhole monitoring of hydraulic-fracturing induced seismicity as well as improved risk mitigation strategies at unconventional exploration sites.