The structure of the critical zone is a product of feedbacks between hydrologic, climatic, biotic, and chemical processes. Ample research within snow-dominated systems has shown that aspect-dependent solar radiation inputs can produce striking differences in vegetation composition, topography, and soil depth between opposing hillslopes. However, more research is needed to understand the role of microclimates on critical zone development within rain-dominated systems, especially below the soil and into weathered bedrock. To address this need, we characterized the critical zone of a north-facing and south-facing slope within a first-order headwater catchment located in central coastal California. We combined terrain analysis of vegetation distribution and topography with field-based soil pit characterization, geophysical surveys and hydrologic measurements between slope-aspects. We observed thicker soil profiles, higher shallow soil moisture, and denser vegetation on north facing slopes, which matched previously documented observations in snow-dominated sites. However, average topographic gradient and saprolite thickness were uniform across our study hillslopes, which did not match common observations from the literature. These results suggest dominant processes for critical zone evolution are not necessarily transferable across regions. Thus, there is a continued need to expand critical zone research, especially in rain-dominated systems. Here, we present four non-exclusive, testable hypotheses of mechanisms that may explain these unexpected similarities in slope and saprolite thickness between hillslopes with opposing aspects. Specifically, we propose both past and present ecohydrologic processes must be taken into account to understand what shaped the present day critical zone.

Quantifying evapotranspiration is critical to accurately predict vegetation health, groundwater recharge, and streamflow generation. Hillslope aspect, the direction a hillslope faces, results in variable incoming solar radiation and subsequent vegetation water use that influence the timing and magnitude of evapotranspiration. Previous work in forested landscapes has shown that equator-facing slopes have higher evapotranspiration due to more direct solar radiation and higher evaporative demand. However, it remains unclear how differences in vegetation type (i.e., grasses and trees) influence evapotranspiration and water partitioning between hillslopes with opposing aspects. Here, we quantified evapotranspiration and subsurface water storage deficits between a pole- and equator-facing hillslope with contrasting vegetation types within central coastal California. Our results suggest that cooler pole-facing slopes with oak trees have higher evapotranspiration than warmer equator-facing slopes with grasses, which is counter to previous work in landscapes with singular vegetation types. Our water storage deficit calculations indicate that the pole-facing slope has a higher subsurface storage deficit and a larger seasonal dry down than the equator-facing slope. This aspect difference in subsurface water storage deficits may influence subsequent deep groundwater recharge and streamflow generation. In addition, larger root-zone storage deficits on pole-facing slopes may reduce their ability to serve as hydrologic refugia for oaks during periods of extended drought. This research provides a novel integration of field-based and remotely-sensed estimates of evapotranspiration required to properly quantify hillslope-scale water balances. These findings emphasize the importance of resolving hillslope-scale vegetation structure within Earth system models, especially in landscapes with diverse vegetation types.