Parthkumar A Modi

and 5 more

The Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) framework combines a probabilistic forecast structure with process-based models for water supply predictions. However, process-based models require computationally intensive parameter estimation, increasing uncertainties and limiting usability. Motivated by the strong performance of deep learning models, we seek to assess whether the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model can provide skillful forecasts and replace process-based models within the ESP framework. Given challenges in implicitly capturing snowpack dynamics within LSTMs for streamflow prediction, we also evaluated the added skill of explicitly incorporating snowpack information to improve hydrologic memory representation. LSTM-ESPs were evaluated under four different scenarios: one excluding snow and three including snow with varied snowpack representations. The LSTM models were trained using information from 664 GAGES-II basins during WY1983-2000. During a testing period, WY2001-2010, 80% of basins exhibited Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) above 0.5 with a median NSE of around 0.70, indicating satisfactory utility in simulating seasonal water supply. LSTM-ESP forecasts were then tested during WY2011-2020 over 76 western US basins with operational NRCS forecasts. A key finding is that in high snow regions, LSTM-ESP forecasts using simplified ablation assumptions performed worse than those excluding snow, highlighting that snow data do not consistently improve LSTM-ESP performance. However, LSTM-ESP forecasts that explicitly incorporated past years’ snow accumulation and ablation performed comparably to NRCS forecasts and better than forecasts excluding snow entirely. Overall, integrating deep learning within an ESP framework shows promise and highlights important considerations for including snowpack information in forecasting.

Mark S. Raleigh

and 5 more

Snowpack accumulation in forested watersheds depends on the amount of snow intercepted in the canopy and its partitioning into sublimation, unloading, and melt. A lack of canopy snow measurements limits our ability to evaluate models that simulate canopy processes and predict snowpack and water supply. Here, we tested whether monitoring changes in wind-induced tree sway can enable snow interception detection and estimation of canopy snow water equivalent (SWE). We monitored hourly tree sway across six years based on 12 Hz accelerometer observations on two subalpine conifer trees in Colorado. We developed an approach to distinguish changes in sway frequency due to thermal effects on tree rigidity versus intercepted snow mass. Over 60% of days with canopy snow had a sway signal in the range of possible thermal effects. However, when tree sway decreased outside the range of thermal effects, canopy snow was present 93-95% of the time, as confirmed with classifications of PhenoCam imagery. Using sway tests, we converted significant changes in sway to canopy SWE, which was correlated with total snowstorm amounts from a nearby SNOTEL site (Spearman r=0.72 to 0.80, p<0.001). Greater canopy SWE was associated with storm temperatures between -7 C and 0 C and wind speeds less than 4 m/s. Lower canopy SWE prevailed in storms with lower temperatures and higher wind speeds. We conclude that monitoring tree sway is a viable approach for quantifying canopy SWE, but challenges remain in converting changes in sway to mass and further distinguishing thermal and mass effects on tree sway.