Mark Richardson
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Author ProfileAbstract
Change in global mean surface temperature (GMST), based on a blend of
land air and ocean water temperatures, is a widely cited climate change
indicator that informs the Paris Agreement goal to limit global warming
since preindustrial to “well below” 2°C. Assessment of current GMST
enables determination of remaining target-consistent warming and
therefore a relevant remaining carbon budget. In recent IPCC reports,
GMST was estimated via linear regression or differences between
decade-plus period means. We propose non-linear continuous local
regression (LOESS) using ±20 year windows to derive GMST across all
periods of interest. Using the three observational GMST datasets with
almost complete interpolated spatial coverage since the 1950s, we
evaluate 1850—1900 to 2019 GMST as 1.14°C with a likely (17—83 %)
range of 1.05—1.25°C, based on combined statistical and observational
uncertainty, compared with linear regression of 1.05°C over 1880—2019.
Performance tests in observational datasets and two model large
ensembles demonstrate that LOESS, like period mean differences, is
unbiased. However, LOESS also provides a statistical uncertainty
estimate and gives warming through 2019, rather than the 1850—1900 to
2010—2019 period mean difference centered at the end of 2014. We
derive historical global near-surface air temperature change (GSAT),
using a subset of CMIP6 climate models to estimate the adjustment
required to account for the difference between ocean water and ocean air
temperatures. We find GSAT of 1.21°C (1.11—1.32°C) and calculate
remaining carbon budgets. We argue that continuous non-linear trend
estimation offers substantial advantages for assessment of long-term
observational GMST.