High resolution and accurate rainfall information is essential to modeling and predicting hydrological processes. Crowdsourced personal weather stations (PWSs) have become increasingly popular in recent years and can provide dense spatial and temporal resolution in rainfall estimates. However, their usefulness is limited due to a lack of trust in crowdsourced data compared to traditional data sources. Using crowdsourced PWSs data without an evaluation of its trustworthiness can result in inaccurate rainfall estimates as PWSs may be poorly maintained or incorrectly sited. In this study, we advance the Reputation System for Crowdsourced Rainfall Networks (RSCRN) to bridge this trust gap by assigning dynamic trust scores to the PWSs. Using rainfall data collected from 18 PWSs in two dense clusters in Houston, Texas USA as a case study, the results show that using RSCRN-derived trust scores can increase the accuracy of 15-min PWS rainfall estimates when compared to rainfall observations recorded at city’s high-fidelity rainfall stations. Overall, RSCRN rainfall estimates improved for 77% (48 out of 62) of the analyzed storm events, with a median RMSE improvement of 27.3%. Compared to an existing PWS quality control method, results showed that while 13 (21%) storm events had the same performance, RSCRN improved rainfall estimates for 78% of the remaining storm events (38 out of 49), with a median RMSE improvement of 13.4%. Using RSCRN-derived trust scores can make the rapidly growing network of PWSs a more useful resource for urban flood management, greatly improving knowledge of rainfall patterns in areas with dense PWSs.

Benjamin Bowes

and 4 more

Coastal cities face recurrent flooding from storm events and rising seas. A contributing factor to flooding in these low relief areas is the groundwater table, which, already relatively shallow, can quickly rise towards the land surface during storm events. This leads to increased surface runoff entering stormwater drainage systems and a greater probability of flooding. As such, groundwater table forecasts could be an important component of real-time flood forecasting systems, but are generally unavailable. Because traditional physics-based models require extensive amounts of subsurface data that is difficult to obtain, especially in urban environments, this research evaluates two types of machine learning models, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Long Short-term Memory neural networks (LSTM), for creating groundwater table forecasts. The two types of networks were built with Tensorflow/Keras to forecast the groundwater table response to forecasted storm events and appropriate hyperparameters were tuned using the Hyperas library. Using observed hourly groundwater levels, rainfall, and tide from the City of Norfolk, Virginia, the networks were trained with data from 2010-2016 and tested with data from 2016-2018. Archived forecast rainfall and tide from two large storms in the test period (Hurricane Hermine and Tropical Storm Julia) were then used to evaluate the effect of forecast inputs on model performance. Results indicate that LSTM is slightly more accurate when forecasting the groundwater table than RNN, likely because of its increased ability to preserve and learn from past information. Average root mean squared error and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency values for an 18hr forecast for the LSTM were 0.06m and 0.89, respectively, and 0.07m and 0.85, respectively, for the RNN. These forecasts could provide valuable information to aid in planning and response to storm events and will become an increasingly important part of effectively modeling and predicting coastal urban flooding as sea level rises.