Paul D Bates

and 28 more

This paper reports a new and significantly enhanced analysis of US flood hazard at 30m spatial resolution. Specific improvements include updated hydrography data, new methods to determine channel depth, more rigorous flood frequency analysis, output downscaling to property tract level and inclusion of the impact of local interventions in the flooding system. For the first time we consider pluvial, fluvial and coastal flood hazards within the same framework and provide projections for both current (rather than historic average) conditions and for future time periods centred on 2035 and 2050 under the RCP4.5 emissions pathway. Validation against high quality local models and the entire catalogue of FEMA 1% annual probability flood maps yielded Critical Success Index values in the range 0.69-0.82. Significant improvements over a previous pluvial/fluvial model version are shown for high frequency events and coastal zones, along with minor improvements in areas where model performance was already good. The result is the first comprehensive and consistent national scale analysis of flood hazard for the conterminous US for both current and future conditions. Even though we consider a stabilization emissions scenario and a near future time horizon we project clear patterns of changing flood hazard (-3.8 to +16% changes in 100yr inundated area at 1° scale), that are significant when considered as a proportion of the land area where human use is possible or in terms of the currently protected land area where the standard of flood defence protection may become compromised by this time.

Arslaan Khalid

and 2 more

Existing real-time coastal flooding guidance systems in the US tend to underestimate total water level (TWL) predictions in upstream tidal areas of the Chesapeake Bay rivers, impacting flood forecasts for highly vulnerable areas, such as the National Capital Region. These under-predictions are mostly due to missing physical processes, lack of integration between hydrological and hydrodynamic models, and an oversimplification of the model setups used to predict TWL. In this study, an integrated TWL forecast system was introduced, where a high-resolution two-dimensional coastal storm surge model (ADCIRC) was implemented to simulate the combined influence of various flood drivers (storm tide, river flows, urban runoff, and local wind forcing) in the Potomac River. In this framework, the downstream boundaries of storm tide predictions are provided by existing coastal guidance systems, whereas, streamflow forecasts at upstream rivers and local urban runoff are provided by the National Weather Service and the National Water Model. Additionally, high-resolution wind fields from the North American Mesoscale and the National Blend of Models are added to account for local wind effects on TWL. This model setup was successfully validated with a range of historical events and it also demonstrated improved forecast performance against the existing large-scale coastal guidance systems in a reforecast evaluation during 2020. Unlike other studies, we provided a comprehensive evaluation on the influence of individual flood drivers on TWL modeling and clearly demonstrated that the absence of one or more flood drivers in the model framework can underestimate simulated TWL in the National Capital Region.