Peter Regier

and 7 more

Authors: Peter Regier1, Kyongho Son2, Xingyuan Chen2, Yilin Fang2, Peishi Jiang2, Micah Taylor2, Wilfred M Wollheim3, James Stegen2Affiliations 1Marine and Coastal Research Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, WA, United States2Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States3University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United StatesAbstract: Hyporheic zones regulate biogeochemical processes in streams and rivers, but high spatiotemporal heterogeneity makes it difficult to predict how these processes scale from individual reaches to river basins. Recent work applying allometric scaling (i.e., power-law relationships between size and function) to river networks provides a new paradigm to develop a scalable understanding of hyporheic biogeochemical processes. We used reach-scale hyporheic aerobic respiration estimates to explore allometric scaling patterns across two basins, and related these patterns to watershed characteristics. We found consistent scaling behaviors at lowest and highest exchange flux (HEF) quantiles, and consistent but HEF-dependent relationships to watershed elevation, precipitation, and land-cover. Our results also suggest variability of hyporheic respiration allometry for middle exchange flux quantiles, and in relation to land-cover. Our findings provide initial evidence that allometric scaling may be useful for predicting hyporheic biogeochemical dynamics across watersheds from reach to basin scales.Scientific Significance Statement: The hyporheic zone is a biogeochemical control point in streams and rivers, and processes like hyporheic respiration are important determinants of how watersheds move and process carbon and nutrients. However, the hyporheic zone is also characterized by high spatial heterogeneity, which makes it difficult to predict how hyporheic functions like respiration change across watersheds from reach to basin scales. This study applies allometric scaling theory, which suggests that function scales in a predictable way with size, to determine if hyporheic respiration scales with watershed area in two basins with contrasting watershed characteristics. We found some consistent patterns between basins that suggest allometric scaling of hyporheic respiration may be a tool for transferable knowledge of hyporheic function between basins, but also note some site-specific relationships may constrain the generalizability of this method to other regions and watersheds.

Kyongho Son

and 4 more

Denitrification in the hyporheic zone (HZ) of river corridors is crucial to removing excess nitrogen in rivers from anthropogenic activities. However, previous modeling studies of the effectiveness of river corridors in removing excess nitrogen via denitrification were often limited to the reach-scale and low-order stream watersheds. We developed a basin-scale river corridor model for the Columbia River Basin with random forest models to identify the dominant factors associated with the spatial variation of HZ denitrification. Our modeling results suggest that the combined effects of hydrologic variability in reaches and substrate availability influenced by land use are associated with the spatial variability of modeled HZ denitrification at the basin scale. Hyporheic exchange flux can explain most of spatial variation of denitrification amounts in reaches of different sizes, while among the reaches affected by different land uses, the combination of hyporheic exchange flux and stream dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration can explain the denitrification differences. Also, we can generalize that the most influential watershed and channel variables controlling denitrification variation are channel morphology parameters (median grain size (D50), stream slope), climate (annual precipitation and evapotranspiration), and stream DOC-related parameters (percent of shrub area). The modeling framework in our study can serve as a valuable tool to identify the limiting factors in removing excess nitrogen pollution in large river basins where direct measurement is often infeasible.