We compute predictions of the deviation of Mercury’s spin axis from an exact Cassini state caused by tidal dissipation, and viscous and electromagnetic (EM) friction at the core-mantle boundary (CMB) and inner core boundary (ICB). Viscous friction at the CMB generates a phase lead, viscous and EM friction at the ICB produce a phase lag; the magnitude of the deviation depends on the inner core size, kinematic viscosity and magnetic field strength, but cannot exceed an upper bound. For a small inner core, viscous friction at the CMB results in a maximum phase lead of 0.027 arcsec. For a large inner core (radius >1000 km), EM friction at the ICB generates the largest phase lag, but it does not exceed 0.1 arcsec. Elastic deformations induced by the misaligned fluid and solid cores play a first order role in the phase lead/lag caused by viscous and EM coupling, and contribute to a perturbation in mantle obliquity on par with that caused by tidal deformations. Tidal dissipation results in a phase lag and its magnitude (in units of arcsec) is given by the empirical relation (80/Q), where Q is the quality factor; Q=80 results in a phase lag of ~1 arcsec. A large inner core with a low viscosity of the order of 10^{17} Pa s or lower can significantly affect Q and thus the resulting phase lag. The limited mantle phase lag suggested by observations (<10 arcsec) implies a lower limit on the bulk mantle viscosity of approximately 10^{17} Pa s.

In a reference frame rotating with Mercury’s mantle and crust, the inner core and fluid core precess in a retrograde sense with a period of 58.646 days. The precession of a triaxial inner core with a different density than the fluid core induces a periodic gravity variation of degree 2, order 1. Elastic deformations from the pressure that the precessing fluid core exerts on the core mantle boundary also contribute to this gravity signal. We show that the periodic change in Stokes coefficients ΔC21 and ΔS21 for this signal of internal origin is of the order of 10^{-10}, similar in magnitude to the signal from solar tides. The relative contribution from the inner core increases with inner core radius and with the amplitude of its tilt angle with respect to the mantle. The latter depends on the strength of electromagnetic coupling at the inner core boundary which in turn depends on the radial magnetic field B_r; a larger B_r generates a larger tilt. The inner core signal features a contrast between ΔC21 and ΔS21 due to its triaxial shape, discernible for an inner core radius >500 km if B_r>0.1 mT, or for an inner core radius >1100 km if B_r<0.01 mT. A detection of this contrast would confirm the presence of an inner core and place constraints on its size and the strength of the internal magnetic field. These would provide key constraints for the thermal evolution of Mercury and for its dynamo mechanism.

Analyses of Lunar Laser Ranging data show that the spin-symmetry axis of the Moon is ahead of its expected Cassini state by an angle of $\phi_p$ = 0.27 arcsec. This indicates the presence of one or more dissipation mechanisms acting on the lunar rotation. A combination of solid-body tides and viscous core-mantle coupling have been proposed in previous studies. Here, we investigate whether viscoelastic deformation within a solid inner core at the centre of the Moon can also account for a part of the observed phase lead angle $\phi_p$. We build a rotational dynamic model of the Cassini state of the Moon that comprises an inner core, a fluid core and a mantle, and where solid regions are allowed to deform viscoelastically in response to an applied forcing. We show that the presence of an inner core does not change the global monthly Q of the Moon and hence, that the contribution from solid-body tides to $\phi_p$ is largely unaffected by an inner core. However, we also show that viscoelastic deformation within the inner core, acting to realign its figure axis with that of the mantle, can contribute significantly to $\phi_p$ through inner core-mantle gravitational coupling. We show that the contribution to $\phi_p$ is largest when the inner core viscosity is in the range of $10^{13}$ to $10^{14}$ Pa s, when the inner core radius is large and when the free inner core nutation frequency approaches a resonance with the precession frequency of $2\pi/18.6$ yr$^{-1}$.

The spin axes of the mantle, fluid core and solid inner core of the Moon precess at frequency $\Omega_p=2\pi/18.6$ yr$^{-1}$ though with different orientations, leading to viscous friction at the core-mantle boundary (CMB) and inner core boundary (ICB). Here, we use a rotational model of the Moon with a range of inner core and outer core radii to investigate the relative importance of viscous dissipation at the CMB and ICB, and to show how this dissipation is connected to the phase lead angle ($\phi_p$) of the mantle ahead of its Cassini state. We show that when the inner core radius is $>80$ km and the free inner core nutation frequency $\Omega_{ficn}$ approaches $\Omega_p$, viscous dissipation at the ICB can be comparable to that at the CMB, and in the most extreme cases exceed it by as much as a factor 10. If so, the viscous dissipation in the lunar core projected back in time depends on how $\Omega_{ficn}$ has evolved relative to $\Omega_p$. We further show that constraints on the CMB and ICB radii of the lunar core can in principle be extracted by matching the observed phase lead of $\phi_p=0.27$ arcsec; this requires an improved estimate of tidal dissipation and an accurate model of the turbulent viscous torque. Lastly, when our rotational model is constrained to match $\phi_p=0.27$ arcsec, our results suggest that the viscous dissipation at the ICB is likely insufficient to have ever been above the threshold to power a thermally driven dynamo.