A document by smetzger. Click on the document to view its contents.

Observing the environment in the vast inaccessible regions of Earth through remote sensing platforms provides the tools to measure ecological dynamics. The Arctic tundra biome, one of the largest inaccessible terrestrial biomes on Earth, requires remote sensing across multiple spatial and temporal scales, from towers to satellites, particularly those equipped for imaging spectroscopy (IS). We describe a rationale for using IS derived from advances in our understanding of Arctic tundra vegetation communities and their interaction with the environment. To best leverage ongoing and forthcoming IS resources, including NASA’s Surface Biology and Geology mission, we identify a series of opportunities and challenges based on intrinsic spectral dimensionality analysis and a review of current data and literature that illustrates the unique attributes of the Arctic tundra biome. These opportunities and challenges include thematic vegetation mapping, complicated by low-stature plants and very fine-scale surface composition heterogeneity; development of scalable algorithms for retrieval of canopy and leaf traits; nuanced variation in vegetation growth and composition that complicates detection of long-term trends; and rapid phenological changes across brief growing seasons that may go undetected due to low revisit frequency or be obscured by snow cover and clouds. We recommend improvements to future field campaigns and satellite missions, advocating for research that combines multi-scale spectroscopy, from lab studies to satellites that enable frequent and continuous long term monitoring, to inform statistical and biophysical approaches to model vegetation dynamics.

The boreal forest plays an important role in the global carbon cycle but has remained a significant source of uncertainty. Remote sensing can help us better understand the boreal forest’s role in the global carbon cycle. A faint light signal emitted by plant’s photosynthetic machinery, known as solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), is a promising remotely sensed proxy for carbon uptake, also known as gross primary productivity (GPP), due to its connection to photosynthesis and its strong relationship with GPP when observed by satellite. However, SIF and GPP are fundamentally different quantities that describe distinct, but related, physiological processes. The relationship between SIF and GPP is therefore complicated by both physical and ecophysiological controls. In particular, the dynamics of the SIF/GPP relationship are poorly understood under varying viewing directions and light conditions. This is further complicated in evergreen systems where canopy clumping and the presence of needles create a unique radiative environment. We use a combination of tower-based SIF and GPP measurements from a boreal forest field site compared with a coupled biochemical-radiative transfer model to understand illumination effects on the SIF/GPP relationship. We find that GPP is amplified under cloudy sky conditions in both measurements and model results. SIF on the other hand, shows no significant difference between sunny or cloudy sky conditions in modeled results, but does show a difference in measurements. We suggest that these differences may be due to viewing geometry effects that are important for SIF under sunny sky conditions or the presence of clumping. Accounting for the differences in the SIF/GPP relationship therefore is critical for the utility of SIF as a proxy for GPP. In summation, our results provide insight into how we can use remote sensing as a tool to understand photosynthesis in the boreal forest.

Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) is a powerful proxy for gross primary productivity (GPP) in Boreal ecosystems. However, SIF and GPP are fundamentally different quantities that describe distinct, but related, physiological processes. Recent work has highlighted non-linearities between SIF and GPP at finer spatial (leaf- to canopy- level) and temporal (half-hourly) scales. Therefore, questions have arisen about when, where, and why SIF is a good proxy for GPP and what the potential sources for divergence between the two are. The goal of this study is to answer two specific questions: 1) At what temporal scale is SIF a good proxy for GPP and 2) What are the predominant physical and ecophysiological drivers of nonlinearity between SIF and GPP in boreal ecosystems? We collected tower-based measurements of SIF (and other common vegetation indices) with PhotoSpec (a custom spectrometer system) and eddy-covariance GPP data at a 30-minute resolution at the Southern Old Black Spruce Site (SOBS) in Saskatchewan, CA. We applied a combination of statistical and machine learning approaches to disentangle the influence of structural/illumination effects and ecophysiological variations on the SIF signal. Our results show that at a high temporal resolution (half-hourly), SIF and GPP are predominantly dependent on photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Therefore, the non-linear light response of GPP drives non-linearity between SIF and GPP. Additionally, canopy structure and illumination effects become important to the SIF signal at high temporal resolutions. At the seasonal timescale, SIF and GPP exhibit co-varying responses to PAR, even when accounting for changes in canopy structure. We attribute changes in the light responses of SIF and GPP to sustained photoprotection over winter which co-varies with changes in temperature. Finally, we show that the relationship between SIF and GPP has a seasonal dependence caused by small differences between the light use efficiencies of fluorescence and photosynthesis. Accounting for this seasonally variable relationship will improve the use of SIF as a proxy for GPP.