Minibasins on continental margins trap turbidity currents transporting material downslope, but little is known about the inherently three-dimensional (3-D) mechanics of these confined flows. Utilizing new methodology, experimental results quantify flow dynamics in minibasins for the first time. It is shown that dynamics are dominated by 3-D circulation cell structures, across the fill-to-strip-to-spill transition that are controlled by flow discharge. Measurements of velocity throughout circulation cells indicate vorticity dominates strain rate with fluid rotating into the center of cells where it upwells: this influences minibasin sediment trapping potential and deposit heterogeneity. Flow properties link to depositional patterns on minibasin slopes. Specifically, higher input discharges are correlated with higher fluxes into the center of minibasins and reduced deposit tapering on minibasin slopes. This geometry is linked to the amount of sediment rich flow runup on the distal minibasin wall, where flow and sediment is delivered to circulation cells.

We present the first investigation of subsidence due to sediment compaction and consolidation in two laboratory-scale river delta experiments. Spatial and temporal trends in subsidence rates in the experimental setting may elucidate behavior which cannot be directly observed at sufficiently long timescales, except for in reduced scale models such as the ones studied. We compare subsidence between a control experiment using steady boundary conditions, and an otherwise identical experiment which has been treated with a proxy for highly compressible marsh deposits. Both experiments have non-negligible compactional subsidence rates across the delta-top, comparable in magnitude to our boundary condition relative sea level rise of 250 μm/h. Subsidence in the control experiment (on average 54 μm/h) is concentrated in the lowest elevation (<10mm above sea level) areas near the coast and is likely due to creep induced by a rising water table near the shoreface. The treatment experiment exhibits larger (on average 126 μm/h) and more spatially variable subsidence rates controlled mostly by compaction of recent marsh deposits within one channel depth (_10 mm) of the sediment surface. These rates compare favorably with _eld and modeling based subsidence measurements both in relative magnitude and location. We find that subsidence “hot spots” may be relatively ephemeral on longer timescales, but average subsidence across the entire delta can be variable even at our shortest measurement window. This suggests that subsidence rates in a given decade or century may exceed thresholds for marsh platform drowning, even if the long term trend does not.

Rising sea levels, subsidence, and decreased fluvial sediment load threaten river deltas and their marshes. However, the feedbacks between fluvial and marsh deposition remain weakly constrained. We investigate how marsh accumulation impacts the fluvial sediment partitioning between a delta’s topset, coastal zone, and foreset by comparing a delta experiment with proxy marsh accumulation to a control. Marsh accumulation alters fluvial sediment distribution by decreasing the slope in the subaerial marsh window by ~40%, creating an ~8% larger delta top and a ~100% larger marsh platform. The reduced slopes decrease relative delta elevation, and fluvial incursions into the marsh trap 1.3 times more clastic volume. The volume exported to deep water remains unchanged. Marsh deposition shifts elevation distributions towards sea level, which produces a hypsometry akin to field-scale deltas. Given that risk is tied to elevation, marsh accumulation accentuates low-elevation areas, while providing essential land-building capabilities.