The open-source PlanetProfile framework was developed to investigate the interior structure of icy moons based on self-consistency and comparative planetology. The software, originally written in Matlab, relates observed and measured properties, assumptions such as the type of materials present, and laboratory equation-of-state data through geophysical and thermodynamic models to evaluate radial profiles of mechanical, thermodynamic, and electrical properties, as self-consistently as possible. We have created a Python version of PlanetProfile. In the process, we have made optimization improvements and added parallelization and parameter-space search features to utilize fast operation for investigating unresolved questions in planetary geophysics, in which many model inputs are poorly constrained. The Python version links to other scientific software packages, including for evaluating equation-of-state data, magnetic induction calculations, and seismic calculations. Physical models in PlanetProfile have been reconfigured to improve self-consistency and generate the most realistic relationships between properties. Here, we describe the software design and algorithms in detail, summarize models for major moons across the outer solar system, and discuss new inferences about the interior structure of several bodies. The high values and narrow uncertainty ranges reported for the axial moments of inertia for Callisto, Titan, and Io are difficult to reconcile with self-consistent models, requiring highly porous rock layers equivalent to incomplete differentiation for Callisto and Titan, and a high rock melt fraction for Io. This effect is even more pronounced with the more realistic models in the Python version. Radial profiles for each model and comparison to prior work are provided as Zenodo archives.
A key question pertaining to Europa’s habitability is whether hydrothermal activity could be sustained for long periods of time, enabling redox and nutrient exchange between the ocean and rocky interior [e.g. 1, 2]. Europa’s early ocean, if formed during differentiation, could have been infused with gases [3]. A consequence of this initial infusion is that clathrate hydrates may have been stable within the ocean. These clathrates could then rise to the bottom of the ice shell, or blanket the seafloor, depending on their density relative to the ocean. Accumulations of floating and sinking clathrates would affect the geological and thermal evolution of Europa because of their high heat capacity and low thermal conductivity compared to ice Ih, but sinking clathrates could also inhibit chemical exchange between the ocean and the rocky interior. We calculate the stability and density of CH4 and CO2 clathrates, and predict the volumes precipitated at the seafloor or accumulated at the base of the ice shell, for ocean compositions evolved from the interior of Europa during metamorphism on the path towards formation of a metallic core [3]. For a chemically reduced ocean derived from heating a mix of chondritic material near Jupiter [4], plus cometary volatiles, ~2 x 10^7 km^3 of methane clathrates form. These are less dense than the ocean (Fig. 1), and float to the base of the ice shell. However, for a CO2-rich ocean derived from CI or CM chondrites, ~3 x 10^8 – 2 x 10^9 km^3 of CO2 clathrates could form, i.e., sufficient feedstock to form a 13–77 km global layer on the seafloor. A salty ocean (e.g. 10 % MgSO4) or a warm seafloor (316 K) may be needed to prevent the accumulation of a CO2 clathrate blanket (Fig. 1), although the blanketing effect would thin the equilibrium thickness of the clathrate layer to ~500 m for allowable heat fluxes (~50 mW/m^2). [1] Vance, S. et al. (2007). Astrobiology, 7(6), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2007.0075 [2] Klimczak, C. et al. (2019). 50th Lunar. Planet Sci. Conf., Abstract #2132, p. 2912. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019LPI….50.2912K [3] Melwani Daswani, M. et al. (2021). A metamorphic origin for Europa’s ocean (preprint). https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507048.1 [4] Desch, S. J. et al. (2018). Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser., 238(1), 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aad95f