Essential Maintenance: All Authorea-powered sites will be offline 9am-10am EDT Tuesday 28 May
and 11pm-1am EDT Tuesday 28-Wednesday 29 May. We apologise for any inconvenience.

loading page

Near-Source Waveform Modeling to Estimate Shallow Crustal Attenuation and Radiated Energy of Mw 2.0-4.5 Earthquakes
  • +1
  • Keisuke Yoshida,
  • Kentaro Emoto,
  • Shunsuke Takemura,
  • Toru Matsuzawa
Keisuke Yoshida
Tohoku University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Kentaro Emoto
Kyushu University
Author Profile
Shunsuke Takemura
Earthquake Research Institute, the University of Tokyo
Author Profile
Toru Matsuzawa
Tohoku University
Author Profile


Estimating the radiated energy of small-to-moderate (Mw < 5) events remains challenging because their waveforms are strongly distorted during wave propagation. Even when near-source records are available, seismic waves pass through the shallow crust with strong attenuation; consequently, high-frequency energy may be significantly dissipated. Here, we evaluated the degree of energy dissipation in the shallow crust by estimating the depth-dependent attenuation (Q-1) by modeling near-source (< 12 km) waveform data in northern Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. High-quality waveforms recorded by a downhole sensor confined by granite with high seismic velocity helped to investigate this issue. We first estimated the moment tensors for M1–4 events and computed their synthetic waveforms, assuming a tentative one-dimensional -model. We then modified the -model in the 5–20 Hz range such that the frequency components of the synthetic and observed waveforms of small events (Mw < 1.7) matched. The results show that the Q-value is 55 at depths of < 4 km and shows no obvious frequency dependence. Using the derived -model, we estimated the moment-scaled energy (eR) of 3,884 events with Mw 2.0–4.5. The median eR is 3.6×10-5 , similar to the values reported for Mw >6 events, with no obvious Mw dependence. If we use an empirically derived Q-model (~350), the median eR becomes a one-order underestimation (3.1×10-6). These results indicate the importance of accurately assuming the Q-value in the shallow crust for energy estimation of small events, even when near-source high-quality waveforms are available.
13 Dec 2023Submitted to ESS Open Archive
22 Dec 2023Published in ESS Open Archive