Alejandro Tejedor

and 4 more

We present a new metric for braiding intensity to characterize multi-thread systems (e.g., braided and anastomosing rivers) called the Entropic Braiding Index, eBI. This metric is a generalization of the widely used Braiding Index (BI) which is simply the average count of intercepted channels per cross-section. The co-existence of diverse channels (widely different widths and discharges) within river cross-sections distorts the information conveyed by BI, since its value does not reflect the diversity and natural variability of the system. Moreover, the fact that BI is extremely sensitive to resolution (BI increases at higher resolution as smaller scale channels can be resolved) challenges its applicability. eBI, addresses these main drawbacks of BI. eBI is rooted in the concept of Shannon Entropy, and its value can be intuitively interpreted as the equivalent number of equally important (in terms of discharge) channels per cross-section. Thus, if the channels observed in a multi-thread system are all carrying the same amount of discharge, eBI has the same value of BI. On the other hand, if a very dominant channel in terms of discharge co-exists with much smaller channels, eBI would take a value slightly larger than 1 (note that the actual value would depend on the number of small channels and their relative size with respect to the dominant channel). We present a comparative study of BI and eBI for different multi-thread rivers obtained from numerical simulations and remote-sensing data and for different discharge stages. We also provide evidence of the robustness of eBI in contrast to BI when a given river system is studied under different resolutions. Finally, we explore the potential of eBI as a metric to characterize different types of multi-thread systems and their stability.

Chris J Keylock

and 3 more

A long-standing question in geomorphology concerns the applicability of statistical models for elevation data based on fractal or multifractal representations of terrain. One difficulty with addressing this question has been the challenge of ascribing statistical significance to metrics adopted to measure landscape properties. In this paper, we use a recently developed surrogate data algorithm to generate synthetic surfaces with identical elevation values as the source dataset, while also preserving the value of the Hölder exponent at any point (the underpinning characteristic of a multifractal surface). Our primary data are from an experimental study of landscape evolution. This allows us to examine how the statistical properties of the surfaces evolve through time and the extent to which they depart from the simple (multi)fractal formalisms. We also study elevation data from Florida and Washington State. We are able to show that the properties of the experimental and actual terrains depart from the simple statistical models. Of particular note is that the number of sub-basins of a given channel order (for orders sufficiently small relative to the basin order) exhibit a clear increase in complexity after a flux steady-state is established in the experimental study. The actual number of basins is much lower than occur in the surrogates. The imprint of diffusive processes on elevation statistics means that, at the very least, a stochastic model for terrain based on a local formalism needs to consider the joint behavior of the elevations and their scaling (as measured by the pointwise Hölder exponents).

Christopher Keylock

and 3 more

Understanding the complex interplay between erosional and depositional processes, and their relative roles in shaping landscape morphology is a question at the heart of geomorphology. A unified framework for examining this question can be developed by simultaneously considering terrain elevation statistics over multiple scales. We show how a long-standing tool for landscape analysis, the elevation-area or hypsometry, can be complemented by an analysis of the elevation scalings to produce a more sensitive tool for studying the interplay between processes, and their impact on morphology. We then use this method, as well as well-known geomorphic techniques (slope-area scaling relations, the number of basins and basin size as a function of channel order) to demonstrate how the complexity of an experimental landscape evolves through time. Our primary result is that the complexity increases once a flux equilibrium is established as a consequence of the role of diffusive processes acting at intermediate elevations. We gauge landscape complexity by comparing results between the experimental landscape surfaces and those produced from a new algorithm that fixes in place the elevation scaling statistics, but randomizes the elevations with respect to these scalings. We constrain the degree of randomization systematically and use the amount of constraint as a measure of complexity. The starting point for the method is illustrated in the figure, which shows the original landscape (top-left) and three synthetic variants generated with no constraints to the randomization. The value quoted in these panels is the root-mean-squared difference in the elevation values for the synthetic cases relative to the original terrain. This value is greatest where the original ridge becomes a valley. All these landscapes contain the same elevation values (i.e. the same probability distribution functions), and the same elevation scalings at a point. The differences emerge because the elevations themselves are distributed randomly across the surface.
Wildfire indices are used globally to quantify and communicate a wide range of fire characteristics, including fire danger and fire behaviour. Wildfire terminologies, definitions and variables used to compute fire indices vary broadly. This makes it difficult to compare them under a common framework for regional assessment and for future improvements under changing climate and land-use/land-cover conditions. This paper reviews 24 fire indices used worldwide and proposes a simple framework within which they can be classified based on constitutive inputs used for their computation. We differentiate between constitutive inputs that are raw or directly measurable variables such as fuel, weather and topography (referred to as Level 1 inputs) and calculated constitutive inputs such as fuel moisture (as a function of ecology and hydrometeorology); fire behaviour (as a function of spread, energy, and ignition); and dynamic meteorology. These six calculated constitutive inputs are referred to as Level 2 inputs. Based on this classification, our findings indicate that the Burning Index from the United States National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) and the Fire Weather Index from the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS), used by many countries worldwide, utilize the most comprehensive set of Level 2 inputs. In addition, the Level 2 input that is most frequently used by all fire indices is fuel moisture as a function of hydrometeorology and the least integrated input is that of fire ignition. We further group the fire indices in three types: fire weather, fire behaviour, and fire danger indices, according to the open literature definition of their predictant outputs and examine the specific constitutive inputs used in their computation. Most fire indices are based on Level 2 inputs (which use Level 1 inputs) and are predominantly fire danger and fire behaviour indices. This is followed by fire indices that use a combination of both Level 1 and Level 2 inputs, separately and are mostly fire danger indices. Only a few fire indices are computed solely with raw Level 1 inputs and are mainly fire behaviour indices. Providing a comprehensive view of the existing wildfire indices’ utilization and computational structure is expected to be a helpful resource for wildfire researchers and operational experts worldwide. 2