Mikhail Kruglyakov

and 1 more

Imaging Earth's electrical conductivity at mantle depths requires accurate models of the spatial-temporal structure of external (ionospheric and magnetospheric) currents. Such models can also be useful for better retrieving core and crustal fields. Three ionospheric current systems-equatorial electrojet (EEJ), polar electrojet (PEJ), and mid-latitude current system (MLCS; in quiet time called Sq) produce quasi-periodic diurnal variations (DV). The signals at longer periods (LP) are due to primarily irregular fluctuations of magnetospheric currents. Conventionally, DV and LP signals are treated separately. For example, the analysis of LP signals is often based on night-time data to diminish the effects from ionospheric sources. However, due to EM induction in the Earth, the signals of ionospheric origin also persist during the night. As for DV, their analysis is usually  performed in the frequency domain. However, the morphology of all ionospheric sources varies from day to day, depending on the solar activity and the Earth’s orbital position,  advocating analysis of DV in the time domain. Besides, the analysis of EEJ and MLCS signals is usually based on non-polar data to diminish the effects from PEJ. In this study, we present a methodology to simultaneously model magnetic fields from all the sources directly in the time domain using night- and day-time as well as non-polar and polar data. An approach exploits two types of source parameterisation (data-based and physics-based) and accounts for 3-D electromagnetic induction effects. Using observatory data, we obtain continuous spatio-temporal models of multi-source external and induced magnetic fields for 1998-2021. We also discuss an adaptation of the approach to analyse satellite data.

Mikhail Kruglyakov

and 2 more

Directional drilling in the oil fields relies particularly on the “on-fly” measurements of the natural magnetic field (measurements while drilling; MWD); the MWD are eventually used to construct the well path. These measurements are the superposition of the signals from the internal, core and crustal, and external, ionospheric and magnetospheric sources and the noise from magnetic elements in the borehole assembly. The internal signals are mostly constant in time and accounted for through the Earth’s internal field models. The signals of external origin give rise to diurnal and irregular spatio-temporal magnetic field variations observable in the MWD. One of the common ways to mitigate the effects of these variations in the MWD is to correct readings for the data from an adjacent land-based magnetic observatory/site. This method assumes that the land-based signals are similar to those at the seabed drilling site. In this paper, we show that the sea level and seabed horizontal magnetic fields differ significantly, reaching up to 30\,\% of sea level values in many oceanic regions. We made this inference from the global forward modeling of the magnetic field using realistic models of conducting Earth and time-varying sources. To perform such modeling, we elaborated a numerical approach to efficiently calculate the spatio-temporal evolution of the magnetic field. Finally, we propose and validate a formalism allowing researchers to obtain trustworthy seabed signals using measurements at the adjacent land-based site and exploiting the modelling results, thus without needing additional measurements at the seabed site.

Elena Marshalko

and 6 more

Ground-based technological systems, such as power grids, can be affected by geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) during geomagnetic storms and magnetospheric substorms. This motivates the necessity to numerically simulate and, ultimately, forecast GIC. The prerequisite for the GIC modeling in the region of interest is the simulation of the ground geoelectric field (GEF) in the same region. The modeling of the GEF in its turn requires spatio-temporal specification of the source which generates the GEF, as well as an adequate regional model of the Earth’s electrical conductivity. In this paper we compare results of the GEF (and ground magnetic field) simulations using three different source models. Two models represent the source as a laterally varying sheet current flowing above the Earth. The first model is constructed using the results of a physics-based 3-D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation of near-Earth space, the second one uses ground-based magnetometers’ data and the Spherical Elementary Current Systems (SECS) method. The third model is based on a “plane wave” approximation which assumes that the source is locally laterally uniform. Fennoscandia is chosen as a study region and the simulations are performed for the 7-8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm. We conclude that ground magnetic field perturbations are reproduced more accurately using the source constructed via the SECS method compared to the source obtained on the basis of MHD simulation outputs. We also show that the difference between the GEF modeled using laterally nonuniform source and plane wave approximation is substantial in Fennoscandia.

Chaojian Chen

and 2 more