Abstract
Paleo-temperature data indicates that the Earth’s mantle did not cool at
a constant rate over geologic time. The data are consistent with slow
cooling from 3.8 to ~2.5 billion years ago with a
transition to more rapid cooling extending to the present. This has been
suggested to indicate a change in global tectonics from a single plate
to a plate tectonic mode. However, a tectonic change may not be
necessary. Multi-stage cooling can result from deep water cycling
coupled to thermal mantle convection. Melting and volcanism removes
water from the mantle (degassing). Dehydration tends to stiffens the
mantle, which slows convective vigor and plate velocities causing mantle
heating. An increase in temperature tends to lower mantle viscosity
which acts to increase plate velocities provided that mantle viscosity
offers resistance to plate motion. If these two tendencies are in
balance, then mantle cooling can be weak. If the balance is broken, by a
switch to net mantle rehydration, then the mantle can cool more rapidly.
We use coupled water cycling and mantle convection models to test the
viability of this hypothesis. Within model and data uncertainty, the
hypothesis that deep water cycling can lead to a multi-stage Earth
cooling is consistent with present day and paleo data constraints on
mantle cooling. It is also consistent with constraints that indicate a
change from net mantle dehydration to rehydration over the Earth’s
geologic evolution. Probability distributions, for successful models,
indicate that plate and plate margin strength play a relatively minor
role for resisting plate motions relative to the resistance from
interior mantle viscosity.