Understanding mechanical processes occurring on faults requires detailed information on the microseismicity that can be enhanced today by advanced techniques for earthquake detection. This problem is challenging when the seismicity rate is low and most of the earthquakes occur at depth. In this study, we compare three detection techniques, the autocorrelation FAST, the machine learning EQTransformer, and the template matching EQCorrScan, to assess their ability to improve catalogs associated with seismic sequences in the normal fault system of Southern Apennines (Italy) using data from the Irpinia Near Fault Observatory (INFO). We found that the integration of the machine learning and template matching detectors, the former providing templates for the cross-correlation, largely outperforms techniques based on autocorrelation and machine learning alone, featuring an enrichment of the automatic and manual catalogs of factors 21 and 7 respectively. Since output catalogs can be polluted by many false positives, we applied refined event selection based on the cumulative distribution of their similarity level. We can thus clean up the detection lists and analyze final subsets dominated by real events. The magnitude of completeness decreases by more than one unit compared to the reference value for the network. We report b-values associated with sequences smaller than the average, likely corresponding to larger differential stresses than for the background seismicity of the area. For all the analyzed sequences, we found that main events are anticipated by foreshocks, indicating a possible preparation process for mainshocks at sub-kilometric scales.

Xin Liu

and 1 more

Xin Liu

and 2 more

Cross-correlation of fully diffuse wavefields averaged over time should converge to the Green’s function; however, the ambient seismic field in the real Earth is not fully diffuse, which interferes with that convergence. We apply blind signal separation to reduce the effect of spurious non-diffuse components on the cross-correlation tensor of the ambient seismic field. We describe the diffuse component as having uncorrelated neighboring frequencies and equal intensity at all azimuths, and an independent (i.e., statistically uncorrelated) non-diffuse component arising from a spatially isolated point source for which neighboring frequencies are correlated. Under the assumption of linear independence of the spurious non-diffuse wave outside the stationary phase zone and the constructive interference of noise waves within that zone, we can suppress the spurious non-diffuse component from the noise interferometry. Our numerical simulations show good separation of one spurious non-diffuse noise source component for either non-diffuse Rayleigh or Love waves. We apply this separation to the Rayleigh-wave component of the Green’s function for 136 cross-correlation pairs from 17 stations in Southern California. We perform beamforming over different frequency bands for the cross-correlations before and after the separation, and find that the reconstructed Rayleigh waves are more coherent. We also estimate the bias in Rayleigh wave phase velocity for each receiver pair due to the spurious non-diffuse contribution.