In this study, we for the first time applied a joint geodynamic-geophysical inversion (JGGI) approach to oceanic plateau subduction models, and compared the subduction style and corresponding topography and Bouguer gravity of two representative subduction scenarios with passive or active collision. We showed that the case of passive collision of the Ontong Java Plateau (OJP) crust better explains the topography, gravity, and seismic data than the active collision scenario. This implies that the OJP did not control the regional dynamics during the collisional process. We conclude that previous studies may have overestimated the role of the OJP in triggering subduction initiation, subduction polarity reversal, and even Pacific Plate rotation.

It is generally accepted that the subduction polarity reversal (SPR) results from the strong collision of two plates. Yet, the SPR of the Solomon Back-arc Basin is started in the “soft docking” stage, and the mechanism by which the “soft docking” induced subduction initiation (SI) remains elusive. We find that the mass depletion of the plateau influences the evolution of the subduction patterns during SI. And the island arc rheological strength affects the development of the shear zone between an island arc and back-arc basin which favors SI. What’s more, with the increase of the rheological strength difference, the SI is more easily to occur, and the contribution of the plateau collision to SI weakens. Hence, by combining the available geological evidence, we suggest that the Solomon Island Arc rheological strength and the Ontong-Java plateau collision jointly controlled the SI during the “soft docking” stage.