Does allergen immunotherapy impact the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19？To the editor,Allergic asthma (AA) and allergic rhinitis (AR) might be protective against SRAS-CoV-2 infection and progress to severe disease of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)1. COVID-19 vaccination was safe and well tolerated in patients receiving allergen immunotherapy (AIT)2,3, and the adherence to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was not affected during COVID-19 pandemic4. Whether AIT impacts the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 is still unknown. In December 2022, China ended its “Zero-COVID” policy and more than 70% of the population got infected with SARS-CoV-2 within one month. We conducted an online WeChat questionnaire between 3rd Jan and 10th Jan 2023 to investigate the infection and hospitalization rates and symptom duration of COVID-19 in AR and/or AA patients receiving SCIT with house-dust mite (HDM) extract in China. The relatives of these SCIT patients, who did not receive SCIT, were also surveyed and divided into two groups: allergy group and non-allergy group. The study was approved by the Medical Ethic Committee of Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Approval Number: TJ-IRB20230204). The informed consent was waived since the voluntary nature of responding to the questionnaire.A total of 1246 SCIT patients and 1078 of their relatives (370 allergic and 708 non-allergic) responded to the questionnaire. SCIT patients were generally younger than allergy and non-allergy group. The proportion of male were higher in SCIT patients compared to allergy and nonallergy group. 82.4% of the SCIT patients were diagnosed with AR, only 5.3% were asthmatics, and the rest were AR with asthma (12.3%). The average duration of AIT was 1.4 ± 1.3 years. SCIT patients had a lower proportion of both at least one dose and completed three doses of COVID-19 vaccines when compared to allergy and non-allergy group (P = 0.000) (Table S1).Most respondents had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. SCIT was associated with a lower infection rate (78.6%) compared to allergy (81.4%) and non-allergy group (81.5%) (P < 0.0001) (Table S2). The duration of COVID-19 symptoms was shorter in SCIT group (5.7 ± 4.0 days) compared to allergy group (7.0 ± 4.5 days, P = 0.000) and non-allergy group (7.7 ± 4.4 days, P = 0.000) (Table S2). The hospitalization rate was 0.4% in SCIT group, which was significantly lower than that in non-allergy group (1.73%) (P = 0.008).We then performed a two-to-one matching of SCIT group with allergy and non-allergy group to adjust age and sex difference between the three groups. The infection rate was still slightly lower in SCIT group compared to allergy and non-allergy group (78.3% vs. 81.9%, 81.4%). The duration of symptoms and hospitalization rate did not show much difference among three groups after adjusting (Table 1).Moreover, we found that patients receiving 6-12 months SCIT had a shorter duration of symptoms caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those in SCIT course < 6 months and those receiving SCIT > 12 months, even though only one fourth of them completed three doses of COVID-19 vaccines (Table 2). shorter duration of symptoms. The duration of SCIT has no impacts on both infection and hospitalization rate (Table 2).A lower expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in airway epithelia5 may contribute to the protecting effect of type 2 inflammation against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-196. This study revealed an almost same infection rates in allergic and non-allergic individuals after adjusting age and sex, suggesting ACE2 expression level had no effect on Omicron infection. More importantly, SCIT patients has a slightly lower infection rate compared to allergy and non-allergy groups, suggesting that repeated allergen stimulation during SCIT in HDM-sensitized individuals may elicit a strong T cell response with ability to cross-react with SARS-CoV-2, as demonstrated in silico analysis7, which may protect SCIT individuals from infection. The proportion with three doses COVID-19 vaccines were significantly lower in SCIT patients, albeit SCIT was reported to dampen immune responses to SASR-CoV-2 vaccines8, the infection rate of SARS-CoV-2 was still lower in SCIT patients. We also observed a shorter duration of symptoms due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in those receiving 6-12 months HDM-SCIT compared to those receiving < 6 months and > 12 months HDM-SCIT, consistent with previous studies showing the immune responses to SCIT reach a peak during 6-12 months9. EAACI stated recently in a position paper that AIT and COVID-19 immune responses do not seem to interfere negatively, and AIT patients might even benefit from AIT10. Thus, our results for the first time demonstrated that SCIT may have a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially immediately after completing the dose-escalation phase.KEYWORDS: Allergic rhinitis; Allergen immunotherapy; SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus disease 2019; InfectionCONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.Author Contributions: YDG, RFZ and YDC conceived the study, YW and HuC designed the questionnaire and collected data. XD, HaC, YQY and HLL dispensed the questionnaire and monitored the survey. RFZ analyzed the data and YDG wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final review.Acknowledgment : We thank all members of Hubei Provincial Doctors Association Allergic Physicians Branch for their help in the recruitment of patients and relatives into this study.Funding information: none.Yin Wang1Huan Chen2Xiang Dong3Hao Chen1Hui-ling Liang3Ya-qi Yang1Yan-dan Chen2Rong-fei Zhu1Ya-dong Gao3Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Allergy, Central Hospital of Huangshi City, Huangshi, ChinaDepartment of Allergology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan China

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused an unprecedented global social and economic impact, and numerous deaths. Many risk factors have been identified in the progression of COVID-19 into a severe and critical stage, including old age, male gender, underlying comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, chronic lung disease, heart, liver and kidney diseases, tumors, clinically apparent immunodeficiencies, local immunodeficiencies, such as early type-I interferon secretion capacity, and pregnancy. Possible complications include acute respiratory distress syndrome, shock, disseminated coagulopathy, acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, and secondary bacterial pneumonia. The development of lymphopenia and eosinopenia are laboratory indicators of COVID-19. Laboratory parameters to monitor disease progression include lactate dehydrogenase, procalcitonin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and ferritin. The development of a cytokine storm and extensive chest computed tomography imaging patterns are indicators of a severe disease. In addition, socioeconomic status, diet, lifestyle, geographical differences, ethnicity, exposed viral load, day of initiation of treatment, and quality of health care have been reported to influence individual outcomes. In this review, we highlight the scientific evidence on the risk factors of COVID-19.

Background Currently, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become pandemic globally. 10-20% of the cases are severe and more than 397,000 deaths have occurred. The risk factors for the mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients remain to be elucidated. Conclusions Survived severe and non-survived COVID-19 patients had distinct clinical and laboratory characteristics, which were separated by principle component analysis. Logistic regression revealed several risk factors such as elder age, greater affected lobe numbers and higher level of serum CRP for the mortality of severe COVID-19 patients. Longitudinal changes of laboratory findings indicate the advancement of the disease and may be helpful in predicting the progression of severe patients.

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has made widespread impact recently. We aim to investigate the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 children with different severities and allergic status. Pediatric COVID-19 patients tended to have a mild clinical course. Patients with pneumonia had higher proportion of fever and cough and increased inflammatory biomarkers than those without pneumonia. There was no difference between allergic and non-allergic COVID-19 children in aspects of incidence, clinical features, laboratory and immunological findings. Allergy was not a risk factor for developing and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hardly influenced the disease course of COVID-19 in children.