loading page

Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes
  • +9
  • Shouzhi Chen,
  • Yongshuo Fu,
  • Zhaofei Wu,
  • Fanghua Hao,
  • Zengchao Hao,
  • Yahui Guo,
  • Xiaojun Geng,
  • Xiao-Yan Li,
  • Xuan Zhang,
  • Jing Tang,
  • Vijay P Singh,
  • Xuesong Zhang
Shouzhi Chen
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Yongshuo Fu
Beijing Normal University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Zhaofei Wu
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Fanghua Hao
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Zengchao Hao
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Yahui Guo
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Xiaojun Geng
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Xiao-Yan Li
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Xuan Zhang
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Jing Tang
Lund University
Author Profile
Vijay P Singh
Texas A&M University
Author Profile
Xuesong Zhang
Pacific Northwest National Lab
Author Profile

Abstract

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model has been widely applied for simulating the water cycle and quantifying the influence of climate change and anthropogenic activities on hydrological processes. A major uncertainty of SWAT stems from poor representation of vegetation dynamics due to the use of a simplistic vegetation growth and development module. Using long-term remote sensing-based phenological data, we improved the SWAT model’s vegetation module by adding a dynamic growth start date and the dynamic heat requirement for vegetation growth rather than using constant values. We verified the new SWAT model in the Han River basin, China, and found its performance was much improved in comparison with that of the original SWAT model. Specifically, the accuracy of the leaf area index (LAI) simulation improved notably (coefficient of determination (R2) increased by 0.193, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) increased by 0.846, and percent bias decreased by 42.18%), and that of runoff simulation improved modestly (R2 increased by 0.05 and NSE was similar). Additionally, we found that the original SWAT model substantially underestimated evapotranspiration (Penman–Monteith method) in comparison with the new SWAT model (65.09 mm (or 22.17%) for forests, 92.27 mm (or 32%) for orchards, and 96.16 mm (or 36.4 %) for farmland), primarily due to the inaccurate representation of LAI dynamics. Our results suggest that accurate representation of phenological dates in the vegetation growth module is important for improving the SWAT model performance in terms of estimating terrestrial water and energy balance.