loading page

Water Stress Explains the Aerodynamic versus Radiometric Surface Temperature Paradox in Thermal-based Evaporation Modeling
  • +16
  • Kaniska Mallick,
  • Dennis D Baldocchi,
  • Andrew James Jarvis,
  • Tian Hu,
  • Ivonne Trebs,
  • Mauro Sulis,
  • Nishan Bhattarai,
  • Christian Bossung,
  • Yomna Eid,
  • Jamie Cleverly,
  • Jason Beringer,
  • William Woodgate,
  • Richard Silberstein,
  • Nina Hinko-Najera,
  • Wayne Stewart Meyer,
  • Darren Ghent,
  • Zoltan Szantoi,
  • Gilles Boulet,
  • William P. Kustas
Kaniska Mallick
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Dennis D Baldocchi
University of California, Berkeley
Author Profile
Andrew James Jarvis
Lancaster University
Author Profile
Tian Hu
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Author Profile
Ivonne Trebs
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST)
Author Profile
Mauro Sulis
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Author Profile
Nishan Bhattarai
United States Department of Agriculture
Author Profile
Christian Bossung
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Author Profile
Yomna Eid
The Julius Maximilians University of W├╝rzburg
Author Profile
Jamie Cleverly
James Cook University
Author Profile
Jason Beringer
University of Western Australia
Author Profile
William Woodgate
The University of Queensland
Author Profile
Richard Silberstein
Edith Cowan University
Author Profile
Nina Hinko-Najera
University of Melbourne
Author Profile
Wayne Stewart Meyer
University of Adelaide
Author Profile
Darren Ghent
University of Leicester
Author Profile
Zoltan Szantoi
European Space Agency
Author Profile
Gilles Boulet
Author Profile
William P. Kustas
Author Profile


To explain the inequality between aerodynamic and radiometric surface temperature, we used an analytical surface energy balance model where evaporation is directly estimated by constraining the state equations of aerodynamic temperature and biophysical conductances through radiometric temperature. While the derived aerodynamic temperature was comparable with a flux-inverted counterpart, evaporation and sensible heat fluxes also showed good correspondence with in-situ eddy covariance observations over contrasting aridity in Australia. Results showed aerodynamic temperature frequently exceeds the radiometric temperature in arid and semiarid ecosystems for two reasons: (i) declining canopy-surface conductance and evaporative fraction due to escalated water stress and vapor pressure deficit, and (ii) a simultaneous increase in aerodynamic conductance, air temperature and sensible heat flux. The analytical approach provides valuable insights into the long-lasting debate of aerodynamic versus radiometric temperature paradox by recognizing the feedback between biophysical conductances and the supply-demand limit of solar radiation, soil moisture, and vapor pressure deficit.