loading page

Evidence for variation in the genetic basis of sex determination in brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans)
  • +9
  • Grace Pigott,
  • Massa Abo Akel,
  • Malcolm Rogers,
  • Marin Flanagan,
  • Erica Marlette,
  • Matthew Treaster,
  • Shannon Fox,
  • Shaughnessy McCann,
  • Katie Peichel,
  • Michael White,
  • Daniel Jeffries,
  • Jonathan Mee
Grace Pigott
Mount Royal University
Author Profile
Massa Abo Akel
Mount Royal University
Author Profile
Malcolm Rogers
Mount Royal University
Author Profile
Marin Flanagan
Mount Royal University
Author Profile
Erica Marlette
University of Georgia
Author Profile
Matthew Treaster
University of Georgia
Author Profile
Shannon Fox
University of Georgia
Author Profile
Shaughnessy McCann
University of Georgia
Author Profile
Katie Peichel
University of Bern
Author Profile
Michael White
University of Georgia
Author Profile
Daniel Jeffries
University of Bern
Author Profile
Jonathan Mee
Mount Royal University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

The genetic basis of sex determination is typically conserved within species if not within broader lineages. For example, within the stickleback family (Gasterosteidae), AmhY has been identified as a master sex-determination (MSD) gene in multiple species across two genera. By constrast, the existence of within-species variability in the genetic basis of sex determination is not frequently observed but provides an opportunity to understand the evolution and turnover of sex determination systems. In this study, we investigated the consistency with which AmhY is involved in sex determination across 610 individuals from five brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) populations. We designed a PCR-restriction enzyme assay to identify the presence of AmhY in each individual and recorded sexual morphology in each individual in the field at the time of capture. We found that the genetic sex (presence/absence of AmhY) did not match the field-determined phenotypic sex in up to 27% of individuals within a population. This variation in the genetic basis of sex determination in brook stickleback suggests that the mechanism of sex determination in this species is likely more complex than thought when AmhY was first implicated and may still be evolving. Such within-species variation provides an opportunity to further investigate how and why transitions in sex-determination mechanisms occur.
18 Sep 2024Submitted to Molecular Ecology
20 Sep 2024Submission Checks Completed
20 Sep 2024Assigned to Editor
20 Sep 2024Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
25 Sep 2024Reviewer(s) Assigned