loading page

Bioequivalence of four oral prednisolone formulations in children with asthma or asthma-like exacerbations
  • +5
  • Sissel Haslund-Krog,
  • Inger Jørgensen,
  • Jessica Barry,
  • Ron Mathot,
  • Tonny Petersen,
  • Angela Birnbaum,
  • Catherine Sherwin (do not assign),
  • Helle Holst
Sissel Haslund-Krog
Bispebjerg Hospital

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Inger Jørgensen
Hillerød Hospital
Author Profile
Jessica Barry
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Author Profile
Ron Mathot
Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC
Author Profile
Tonny Petersen
Bispebjerg Hospital
Author Profile
Angela Birnbaum
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Author Profile
Catherine Sherwin (do not assign)
Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine
Author Profile
Helle Holst
Novo Nordisk A/S Soborg R&D Centre
Author Profile

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to describe the levels of exposure to different forms of prednisolone in children with asthma or asthma-like symptoms, ages six months to seventeen years old, treated with crushed tablets, oro-dispersible tablets, a liquid suspension, or whole tablets. Methods Participants were randomised to received two out of four different formulations on successive days using a single-center, open-label, two-period, cross-over design. Saliva samples were collected to measure prednisolone concentrations, and a population pharmacokinetic model was used to analyse the data. The bioequivalence of the test drug to the whole tablet was determined using the 90% confidence interval of the ratios of area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax). Results This study enrolled 41 children, with a mean age of 4.9 years ± 3.7 and a mean weight of 21.8 kg ± 10.9; 61% were boys. The pharmacokinetic data were best described by a two-compartment model using plasma concentrations calculated from saliva. The population mean clearance was 317±156 ml/min/70kg, with a mean half-life of 5.3 ± 3.2 hours and a volume of distribution of 141 L/70kg. The liquid suspension demonstrated bioequivalence to the control (whole tablets) in terms of AUC. However, none of the tested formulations were bioequivalent regarding to Cmax. Conclusion The tested formulations did not exhibit bioequivalence (AUC and Cmax) when compared to the whole tablet. Using different prednisolone formulations interchangeably may be challenging, especially in a paediatric population where inter-individual and residual variability in the pharmacokinetics seemed to have significant impact on exposure.