loading page

Droplet digital PCR technique is ultrasensitive for the quantification of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the blood of chronic HBV-infected patients
  • +6
  • Nirupama Trehanpati,
  • Ravinder Singh,
  • Gayatri Ramakrishna,
  • Manoj Kumar,
  • Rahul Kumar,
  • Ekta Gupta,
  • Archana Rastogi,
  • Pranay Tanwar,
  • Shiv Kumar Sarin
Nirupama Trehanpati
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Ravinder Singh
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
Author Profile
Gayatri Ramakrishna
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
Author Profile
Manoj Kumar
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences Department of Hepatology
Author Profile
Rahul Kumar
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Medical Oncology
Author Profile
Ekta Gupta
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
Author Profile
Archana Rastogi
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
Author Profile
Pranay Tanwar
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Medical Oncology
Author Profile
Shiv Kumar Sarin
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences Department of Hepatology
Author Profile

Abstract

Covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is a stable, episomal form of HBV DNA. cccDNA is a true marker for the intrahepatic events in controlled CHB infection. Quantifying cccDNA is critical for monitoring disease progression and efficacy of anti-viral therapies. To standardize the method, total HBV DNA was isolated from HepAD38 cells and digested with three exonuclease enzymes to remove linear and relaxed circular HBV DNA. Purified cccDNA quantification used ddPCR with specific primers. Treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B virus patients (nCHBV, n=36) with detectable HBV DNA and HBsAg, were grouped by HBsAg levels: Group I (HBsAg lo < 2000 IU/ml, n=11) and Group II (HBsAg hi > 2000 IU/ml, n=25). cccDNA, HBV DNA and HBsAg, were quantified in plasma and compared between groups. Correlation with clinical/histopathological features was done. Non-digested 3.6 ^10 6 tet -ve HepAD38 cells showed 316 copies/µl of total viral DNA. After digesting the linear, integrated, and relaxed circular DNA with triple enzymes, 15 copies/µl of cccDNA were detected. Similarly, after DNA digestion, HBsAg lo patients showed a median of 8.5 copies/µl (IQR 2.75-9.75 copies/µl), and HBsAg hi gave a median of 11 copies/µl (IQR 4-16 copies/µl) but with no significant difference between groups (p=0.093). Further, HBsAg lo patients with low cccDNA copy numbers showed significantly higher fibrosis grades than HBsAg hi (p=0.036). We conclude that employing a combined approach utilizing three exonucleases, cccDNA-specific primers, and ddPCR enables the detection of cccDNA copies even in patients exhibiting low levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA. This integrated method offers additional validation as a surrogate diagnostic tool.