loading page

Recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor can be effective as prophylactic treatment in idiopathic non-histaminergic angioedema
  • +5
  • Mehran Alizadeh Aghdam,
  • Zonne Hofman,
  • Michelle Meertens,
  • Ans Lebens,
  • Erik Hack,
  • André Knulst,
  • Coen Maas,
  • Heike Rockmann
Mehran Alizadeh Aghdam
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Zonne Hofman
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Author Profile
Michelle Meertens
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Author Profile
Ans Lebens
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Author Profile
Erik Hack
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Author Profile
André Knulst
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Author Profile
Coen Maas
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Author Profile
Heike Rockmann
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Author Profile

Abstract

Background Idiopathic non-histaminergic acquired angioedema (InH-AAE) does not respond to anti-histamines and is possibly mediated by bradykinin. Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human C1-esterase inhibitor (rhC1-INH), for prophylaxis of InH-AAE, and to evaluate contact system parameters as biomarkers for attacks. Methods A prospective, open-label study of patients with InH-AAE with > 2 AE attacks/month. rhC1-INH (50 IU/kg was administered intravenously; maximum 4200 IU) twice weekly for 2 months, preceded and followed by a one-month period of observation. The primary endpoint was a >50% reduction in attack frequency. C1INH-function and plasma levels of high molecular weight kininogen, factor XII, plasma prekallikrein, C4, cleaved kininogen, d-dimer were evaluated as potential biomarkers. Post-trial follow-up was evaluated in all patients. Results Six patients (mean age 41 years; four female) were enrolled. One patient showed a reduction in attack frequency of 84% (3 versus 19) during rhC1-INH treatment, and showed clinical response to plasma-derived C1-INH but not to omalizumab post-trial. Restarting rhC1-INH treatment resulted in a similarly rapid response. The other 5 patients showed no improvement. No major adverse events were reported. None of the measured biomarkers were related to treatment response. Post-trial, omalizumab was administered to four patients, of which two reported response. Conclusion rhC1-INH treatment was effective in 1 of 6 InH-AAE patients, suggesting a bradykinin-dependent mechanism of attacks in this patient. Response to omalizumab or tranexamic acid during follow-up in a number of the patients points to a heterogeneous pathogenesis of InH-AAE disease requiring a personalised treatment approach.