loading page

Prospective Evaluation of the Effect of Smartphone Electrocardiogram Usage on Anticoagulant Medication Compliance: Results of the Better Outcomes of Anticoagulation Therapy by Observation of Atrial Rhythm (BOAT-OAR) Study
  • +5
  • Andy Tran,
  • Osama Okasha,
  • Daniel Steinhaus,
  • Omair Yousuf,
  • Michael Giocondo,
  • Brian Ramza,
  • Alan Wimmer,
  • Sanjaya Gupta
Andy Tran
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Author Profile
Osama Okasha
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Author Profile
Daniel Steinhaus
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Author Profile
Omair Yousuf
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Author Profile
Michael Giocondo
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Author Profile
Brian Ramza
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Author Profile
Alan Wimmer
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Author Profile
Sanjaya Gupta
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Compliance with anticoagulation treatment for atrial fibrillation is highly variable. Smartphone electrocardiograms that allow patients to have greater insight into their arrhythmia burden may improve anticoagulant compliance. Methods: Patients were enrolled if they had atrial fibrillation with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more, were eligible for anticoagulation and had a smartphone. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a smartphone electrocardiogram (AliveCor, Kardia) to record their electrocardiograms 5 times/week or to the control group. All patients received 6 months of anticoagulant (apixaban) dispensed as 1-month pre-loaded pill boxes. Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled from July 2017 to August 2019, but 5 patients in the monitor arm and 1 in the control arm withdrew prematurely. The monitor and control groups did not differ in age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score, or comorbidities. Median medication compliance was 99.7%, with non-significantly greater compliance in the monitor group (100%) than in the control group (99.7%) (p-value=0.247). There was also no significant difference between missing any dose and use/nonuse of the smartphone monitor (48.9% vs. 55.1%; p-value=0.692). Mean monitor compliance was 86.8% ±14.0% with an average of 4.34 recorded electrocardiograms per week. Monitor group patients with perfect medication compliance had significantly higher monitor compliance than those patients who missed doses (median, 95.3% vs 86.7%; p-value=0.02). Conclusions: In a study population with higher-than-expected medication compliance, the use of smartphone electrocardiogram did not demonstrate an improvement in medication compliance as compared to usual care. Greater monitor compliance was associated with greater medication compliance.