Abstract
Latitudinal diversity gradients are among the most studied
macroecological phenomena. However, they tend to be described using
large composite datasets that often show taxonomic and geographic
sampling bias. Here we describe a latitudinal gradient in marine
bivalves along the eastern coastline of Australia, spanning 2,667km of
coastline and 20° of latitude. We utilise a large, structured field
dataset (5,552 individuals) in conjunction with a routine
macroecological dataset downloaded from the Ocean Biogeographic
Information System (OBIS - 36,226 specimens). Diversity is estimated
using a series of analytical methods to account for undersampling, and
biogeographic gradients in taxonomic composition are quantified and
compared to existing biogeographical schemes. A strong latitudinal
gradient is present in both datasets. However, the strength of the
gradient depends on the dataset and analytical method used. The
inclusion of observational data in the macroecological dataset obscures
any latitudinal pattern. The documented biogeographic gradients are
consistent with global and regional reconstructions. However, we find
evidence for a strong transition zone between two clusters. Although
latitudinal gradients inferred from large macroecological datasets such
as OBIS can match those inferred from field data, care should be taken
when curating downloaded data as small changes in protocol can generate
very different results. By contrast, even modest regional field datasets
can readily reconstruct latitudinal patterns.