loading page

Prevalence, Contemporary Trends and Associated Factors of Potentially Inappropriate Prescription of Edoxaban in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Subanalysis of the SUNSHINE Registry
  • +10
  • Shujuan Zhao,
  • Hengfen Dai,
  • Jiaxin Chen,
  • Ming Ni,
  • Wenxing Peng,
  • Xiaoyu Li,
  • Fen Li,
  • Boya Chen,
  • Haixia Cai,
  • Yinping Liu,
  • Zhichun Gu,
  • Song Du,
  • PeiZhi Ma
Shujuan Zhao
Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University
Author Profile
Hengfen Dai
Fujian Medical University Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital
Author Profile
Jiaxin Chen
Ningde Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Ningde Normal University
Author Profile
Ming Ni
Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital
Author Profile
Wenxing Peng
Author Profile
Xiaoyu Li
Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University
Author Profile
Fen Li
Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University
Author Profile
Boya Chen
Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University
Author Profile
Haixia Cai
Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University
Author Profile
Yinping Liu
Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University
Author Profile
Zhichun Gu
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital
Author Profile
Song Du
Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University
Author Profile
PeiZhi Ma

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Aim: As the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) most recently approved in China, data pertaining to clinical edoxaban use are still scarce. This study investigated the prevalence of and contemporary trends in edoxaban prescription among Chinese patients as well as factors associated with its inappropriate use in a multi-center registry of patients treated in real-world clinical practice. Methods: This real-world, prospective, multicenter, and non-interventional study included 1005 inpatients treated with edoxaban. According to National Medical Products Administration and European Heart Rhythm Association guidelines, edoxaban therapy was determined to be appropriate or inappropriate in each case. Results: The median patient age was 70.0 years (interquartile range, 61.0–78.0 years), and 46.3% were women. Overall, 456 (45.4%) patients received inappropriate edoxaban therapy, and common issues included an inappropriately low (183, 18.2%) or high (73, 7.3%) dosage, wrong drug selection (109, 10.8%), unreasonable off-label use (49, 4.9%), incorrect administration timing (16, 1.6%), and contraindication due to other medications (27, 2.7%). Several factors (e.g., age, weight, kidney function, anemia, and bleeding history) were associated with an increased risk of inappropriate edoxaban therapy, whereas factors associated with cardiovascular specialties (e.g., hospitalized in cardiovascular department and dronedarone or amiodarone use) decreased this risk. Conclusion: In this real-world study, 45.4% of patients received an inappropriate treatment with edoxaban. Multiple clinical characteristics can help identify patients who should receive edoxaban. Further development and implantation of educational activities and management strategies are needed to ensure the correct use of edoxaban.
08 Aug 2023Submitted to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
09 Aug 2023Submission Checks Completed
09 Aug 2023Assigned to Editor
09 Aug 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
11 Aug 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
16 Sep 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Major
09 Oct 20231st Revision Received
09 Oct 2023Submission Checks Completed
09 Oct 2023Assigned to Editor
09 Oct 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
13 Oct 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Major
19 Oct 20232nd Revision Received
20 Oct 2023Submission Checks Completed
20 Oct 2023Assigned to Editor
20 Oct 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
05 Nov 2023Editorial Decision: Accept