loading page

Simulations of multiple breeding strategy scenarios in common bean for assessing genomic selection accuracy and model updating
  • +5
  • Isabella Chiaravallotti,
  • Jennifer Lin,
  • Vivi Arief,
  • Zulfi Jahufer,
  • Juan M. Osorno,
  • Phillip McClean,
  • Diego Jarquin,
  • Valerio Hoyos-Villegas
Isabella Chiaravallotti
McGill University
Author Profile
Jennifer Lin
McGill University
Author Profile
Vivi Arief
The University of Queensland
Author Profile
Zulfi Jahufer
The University of Queensland
Author Profile
Juan M. Osorno
North Dakota State University
Author Profile
Phillip McClean
North Dakota State University
Author Profile
Diego Jarquin
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Author Profile
Valerio Hoyos-Villegas
McGill University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Genomic prediction allows breeders to make selections based on the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) of selection candidates. GEBVs are assigned using a prediction model trained with genotypes and phenotypes from a training population. For this reason, the effectiveness of genomic selection is strongly tied to the prediction accuracy of the model used to estimate breeding values and the training population used to inform the model. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (rrBLUP) model across different traits, parent population sizes, and breeding strategies when estimating breeding values in Phaseolus vulgaris. The model was trained on a simulated population genotyped for 1010 SNP markers including 38 known QTLs identified in the literature (Lin, 2022). Simulation results revealed that realized accuracies fluctuate depending on the factors investigated: trait genetic architecture, breeding strategy, and the number of initial parents involved in the breeding program. Trait architecture and breeding strategy appeared to have a larger impact on accuracy than the initial number of parents. Generally, maximum accuracies were achieved under a mass selection strategy followed by pedigree and single-seed descent methods. This study also investigated model updating, which involves re-training the prediction model with a more relevant set of genotypes and phenotypes. While it has been repeatedly shown that model updating generally improves prediction accuracy, it benefitted some breeding strategies more than others. For low heritability traits (e.g., yield) conventional phenotype-based selection methods showed consistent rates of genetic gain, but genetic gain under genomic selection reached a plateau in after fewer cycles.
20 Nov 2024Submitted to ESS Open Archive
21 Nov 2024Published in ESS Open Archive