Fig. 9. Power dissipation under different data switching activities
Table 2 presents a comparison of different LCFFs in various aspects, where the average power consumption and PDP are measured with α being 50%. Compared with other LCFFs, the PDP of DBS-LCFFCC decreases by 67.2%, 25.2%, 47.1%, 19.2%, 41%, and 29.9%, respectively, while the PDP of DBS-LCFFP decreases by 76.3%, 45.9%, 61.7%, 41.6%, 57.4%, and 49.3%, respectively. Although the power consumption of DBS-LCFFP is higher than the DBS-LCFFCC, it has a lower PDP due to the advantage of DBS-LCFFP in delay, which compensates for the loss in power consumption.
Table 2. Performance comparison of various LCFFs