Background Yellow fever (YF) is a zoonotic arboviral disease that is mainly transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes. It mainly infect both, human and non-human primates including the endangered mountain gorillas. Despite that Yellow fever is a vaccine preventable disease, according to the World Health Organization, it is still endemic in 47 countries; 72% of those countries are in Africa and 28% in Central and South America. Methodology We deployed several transdisciplinary research methods for the implementation of this risk assessment and situation analysis as well as developing national preparedness, prevention, and response strategy for YF in Rwanda. These methods included epidemiological and entomological surveys, health system analysis, and stakeholders and expert consultations. This was supported with in-depth desk and literature review analysis. Results We have identified high risk of Yellow fever emergence and outbreaks in Rwanda. The main underpinning sources of this risk are including the confirmed presence of the main vector of the disease; Aedes aegypti. More importantly, the lack of vector surveillance for Aedes mosquitoes, surveillance for the disease among human or animals at risk in the country despite the ongoing transmission in the region including countries with open-borders and free movements with Rwanda. Additional important sources of risk include limited vaccination coverage and requirement for travelers to and from endemic countries. Accordingly, we have developed a preparedness, prevention, and response (PPR) framework for Yellow fever in Rwanda. Conclusion In addition to strengthen the implementation of the developed preparedness, prevention, and control measures, the One Health authority should invest in the establishment and operation of integrated surveillance and response system that comprehensively monitors the indicators of humans, animals, and environmental health. Additional support should be given to operational research to generate evidence that informs policymaking, and guide the strategic planning and implementation of cost-effective interventions.

Emmanuel Siddig

and 1 more

1 Introduction:Intestinal parasites are causing a significant global health concern, with over 3.5 billion people affected worldwide [1,2,3]. The infestation rates vary depending on the country of residence and individual demographics related to populations’ exposure. Common intestinal parasites include soil-transmitted helminths such asAscaris lumbricoides , Trichuris trichiura , hookworm, and protozoa like Giardia intestinalis and Entamoeba spp [4, 5]. Least developed countries in particular, face higher prevalence and burden rates of these infections due to factors related to poverty and underdevelopment including limited access to clean water, poor hygiene and sanitation practices, malnutrition, and hot and humid climates [6,7]. This combination of conditions and practices create an ideal environment for the transmission, spread, and local establishment of intestinal parasites [8,9,10]. Sudan and South Sudan are predominantly endemic with soil-transmitted helminthes and other parasitic diseases [10 - 23].Additionally, infection with intestinal parasites poses a serious health, socio-cultural, and economic burdens in endemic countries, while in industrialized nations, mainly immigrants, seasonal workers, and nomadic populations are the primary groups at risk [24, 25]. Transmission of parasites can occur through direct person-to-person contact or contact with contaminated sources like food, water, or soil [26]. In high burden areas, coinfections with multiple parasites are increasingly occurring due to the poor living conditions, malnutrition, and weakened immuno-system [27,28, 29]. It lead to high morbidity, mortality, disability, and enhance the susceptibility to other infections [27 - 29]. Children, teens and adult, are at higher risk of adverse health outcomes with multiple parasitic infections compared to single infestations [30]. Here, we report case to highlight how poor socio-economic conditions and disadvantaged living situations of immigrants can profoundly affect health outcomes even in developed countries.