Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

Adrien Pierre

and 8 more

The thermal regime of hydroelectric reservoirs differs from that of lakes, as it is influenced not only by natural inflows and outflows of energy, but also by management rules through regulated downstream constraints and more importantly the electric demand through turbine flows. These advection terms are rarely assessed for hydroelectric reservoirs particularly in eastern North America, a region where they are abundant. This study contributes, using a series of unique observations, to the assessment of the water and energy balances of the 85-km 2 Romaine-2 northern reservoir (50.69°N; 63.24°W) with an average depth of 44 m. Two thermistor chains were deployed to monitor the dynamics of the vertical temperature profiles from 2018 to 2022. The surface energy balance components were measured using two eddy-covariance stations. Summer stratification occurs from June to November, and winter stratification from December to May. The maximum water temperature gradient of the metalimnion was 1°C m –1 in mid-September, and the maximum depth of the thermocline was 35 m in late October, before the autumn mixing period. We found that the water balance of the reservoir was mainly controlled by turbine operations, with a hydraulic residence time of 5.4 months. Net radiation was found to be the main source of energy to the reservoir (95.6% of the energy input), and the net advection of heat was weak (4.4%) in a steady state reservoir. Latent (58.5%) and sensible (16.5%) heat fluxes dominated the outflow energy balance. In short, this study highlights that the heat advection term represents a small fraction of the annual energy budget for the subarctic reservoir under study, despite being the dominant term in its water budget.