Comparing agriculture-related characteristics of flash and normal
drought reveals heterogeneous crop response
Abstract
Despite rapid progress in the burgeoning field of flash drought
research, few studies directly compare the differences in
characteristics between flash drought (commonly understood as quick,
rapid-onset drought) and drought traditionally defined as slow-moving
(henceforth normal drought), particularly over agricultural regions
where drought effects may be economically the most disastrous. In this
study, flash and normal drought events are identified using reanalysis
soil moisture in the data-rich agricultural region of the California
Central Valley for investigation of characteristics related to
agriculture. In particular, we investigate the relative duration of
pixels in drought events, the correlation of drought intensity with
vegetation condition, the impact of aridity on vegetation response and
drought, and the differences in the different characteristics between
rainfed and irrigated agriculture. Overall, we found considerable
differences between flash and normal drought, particularly in their
spatial distributions and behavior in relation to aridity. Flash
droughts even indicate a counterintuitive improvement in vegetation
condition in the northern, more humid regions, likely due to the release
of growth limiting factors (e.g. below-optimum temperature and
radiation) associated with drought. Results also indicate improvements
in vegetation conditions during normal drought for irrigated land over
rainfed, highlighting the importance of irrigation as a drought
protection strategy in agriculture.