Local magnetic anomalies explain bias in paleomagnetic data: consequences for sampling
Abstract
Volcanic rocks are considered reliable recorders of past changes in the
Earth’s magnetic field. Recent flows, however, sometimes fail to produce
the known magnetic field at the time of cooling. Here, we tested the
accuracy of paleomagnetic data recorded by Mt. Etna lavas by comparing
paleomagnetic data from historical flows to direct measurements of the
magnetic field above the current topography. The inclinations and
intensities in both data sets are biased towards lower values. They vary
as a function of topography; both are higher above ridges and lower in
gullies. To suppress this paleomagnetic data bias it is important to
take samples several meters apart and from different parts of the flow
whenever possible. While this leads to a higher degree of scatter in
paleodirections, the results will better represent the Earth’s magnetic
field at the time of cooling. This emphasises the importance of
reporting paleomagnetic sampling strategies in detail.