The SDG monitoring framework provides limited evidence that
environmental policies are delivering multiple ecological and social
benefits
Abstract
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide targets for humanity to
achieve sustainable development by 2030. A monitoring framework of 248
environmental, social, and economic indicators, reported nationally by
193 UN Member States, tracks progress. The framework includes 92
environmental indicators, most of which refer to environmental policies.
The SDG monitoring framework provides data to assess whether, across
countries, environmental policies are: 1. Addressing environmental
pressures, 2. Linked to environmental improvements, and 3. Linked with
societal benefits delivered by healthy environments. We use statistical
analysis and a generalized linear modeling approach to test for
correlations between SDG indicators related to environmental policies,
environmental pressures, the state of the environment, and social
impacts delivered by healthy environments. Our results show that
environmental policies, particularly protected areas and sustainable
forest certification, are linked with environmental improvements, mainly
in forest and water ecosystems. However, we find no evidence that
environmental improvements are linked with positive social impacts.
Finally, environmental pressures, including freshwater withdrawal,
domestic material consumption, and tourism, are linked with
environmental degradation. Environmental policy responses are generally
increasing across countries. Despite this, the state of the environment
globally continues to decline. Governments must focus on understanding
why environmental policies have not been sufficient to reverse
environmental decline, particularly concerning the pressures that
continue to degrade the environment. To better track progress towards
sustainable development, we recommend that the SDG monitoring framework
is supplemented with additional indicators on the state of the
environment.