Reference
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PMID: 33538338.
2. Berti FCB, Salviano-Silva A, Beckert HC, de Oliveira KB, Cipolla GA, Malheiros D. From squamous intraepithelial lesions to cervical cancer: Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers in cervical carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019 Dec;1872(2):188306. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 6. PMID: 31398380.
3. Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Kehar R, Gandhi S, Chen Y, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Nov 28. PMID: 26643302.
4. Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, Kyrgiou M, Tzafetas M, Ghaem-Maghami S, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1665-1679. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30700-3. Epub 2017 Nov 7. PMID: 29126708.
5. Murakami I, Ohno A, Ikeda M, Yamashita H, Mikami M, Kobayashi Y, et al. Analysis of pathological and clinical characteristics of cervical conization according to age group in Japan. Heliyon. 2020 Oct 8;6(10):e05193. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05193. PMID: 33088958; PMCID: PMC7560578.
6. Ikeda M, Mikami M, Yasaka M, Enomoto T, Kobayashi Y, Nagase S, et al. Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(5):e68. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e68. Epub 2021 May 10. PMID: 34132067; PMCID: PMC8362807.
7. Alder S, Megyessi D, Sundström K, Östensson E, Mints M, Belkić K, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):172.e1-172.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.042. Epub 2019 Aug 29. PMID: 31473226.
8. Dou Y, Zhang X, Li Y, Wang F, Xie X, Wang X. Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis. Front Med. 2017 Jun;11(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0517-8. Epub 2017 May 10. PMID: 28488232.
9. Murta EF, Silva AO, Silva EA. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27(1):50-2. PMID: 16550969.
10. Koc N, Sahin D, Ayas S. Reevaluation of negative cone biopsy results after a positive cervical biopsy finding. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Apr;17(2):154-9. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825c33f9. PMID: 23519286.
11.  Jun Zhang, Jing Yang, Yan Zhang, Xing Li, Yaqin Peng, Yu Zhangl. Research progress on the related factors and treatment of positive margin after cervical conization. Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception. 2019;(11):930-936. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2916.2019.11.013
12. Bae HS, Chung YW, Kim T, Lee KW, Song JY. The appropriate cone depth to avoid endocervical margin involvement is dependent on age and disease severity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Feb;92(2):185-92. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12025. Epub 2012 Dec 5. PMID: 23034067.
13. Nam KH, Kwon JY, Kim YH, Park YW. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Dec 30;21(4):225-9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.225. Epub 2010 Dec 31. PMID: 21278883; PMCID: PMC3026300.
14. Zhao C, Liu J, Li MZ,Zhao Y, Bi H, Sui L, Wei LH. Practices for cervical conization. Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstertrics and Gynecology. 22.02(2021):218-219. doi:10.13390/j.issn.1672-1861.2021.02.042.
15. Mikami M, Ikeda M, Sato H, Iwase H, Enomoto T, Kobayashi Y, et al. The use of conization to identify and treat severe lesions among prediagnosed CIN1 and 2 patients in Japan. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;29(4):e46. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e46. Epub 2018 Mar 8. PMID: 29770617; PMCID: PMC5981098.
16. Papoutsis D, Rodolakis A, Mesogitis S, Sotiropoulou M, Antsaklis A. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75(3):163-8. doi: 10.1159/000345864. Epub 2012 Dec 28. PMID: 23296191.
17. Kawano K, Tsuda N, Nishio S, Yonemoto K, Tasaki K, Tasaki R, et al. Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(5):e54. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e54. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PMID: 27401478; PMCID: PMC4944020.