Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

Hot or not? An evaluation of methods for identifying hot moments of nitrous oxide emissions from soils
  • +2
  • Emily Stuchiner,
  • Jiacheng Xu,
  • William C Eddy,
  • Evan H DeLucia,
  • Wendy H Yang
Emily Stuchiner
Colorado State University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jiacheng Xu
University of Kentucky
Author Profile
William C Eddy
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Author Profile
Evan H DeLucia
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Author Profile
Wendy H Yang
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
Author Profile

Abstract

Effectively quantifying hot moments of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from agricultural soils is critical for managing this potent greenhouse gas. However, we are challenged by a lack of standard approaches for identifying hot moments, including (1) determining thresholds above which emissions are considered hot moments, and (2) considering seasonal variation in the magnitude and frequency distribution of net N2O fluxes. We used one year of hourly N2O flux measurements from 16 autochambers that varied in flux magnitude and frequency distribution in a conventionally tilled maize field in central Illinois, USA to compare three approaches to identify hot moment thresholds: 4x the standard deviation (SD) above the mean, 1.5x the interquartile range (IQR), and isolation forest (IF) identification of anomalous values. We also compared these approaches on seasonally subdivided data (early, late, non-growing seasons) vs. the whole year. Our analyses of the datasets revealed that 1.5x IQR method best identified N2O hot moments. In contrast, the 4 SD method yielded hot moment threshold values too high, and the IF method yielded threshold values too low, leading to missed N2O hot moments or low net N2O fluxes mischaracterized as hot moments, respectively. Furthermore, seasonally subdividing the dataset facilitated identification of smaller hot moments in the late and non-growing seasons when N2O hot moments were generally smaller, but it also increased hot moment threshold values in the early growing season when N2O hot moments were larger. Consequently, we recommend using the 1.5x IQR method on whole year datasets to identify N2O hot moments.
14 Mar 2024Submitted to ESS Open Archive
15 Mar 2024Published in ESS Open Archive