loading page

Genesis locations of the costliest atmospheric rivers impacting the Western United States
  • +5
  • Hamish D Prince,
  • Peter B Gibson,
  • Michael J DeFlorio,
  • Thomas Corringham,
  • Alison Cobb,
  • Bin Guan,
  • F. Martin Ralph,
  • Duane Edward Waliser
Hamish D Prince
Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Peter B Gibson
Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego
Author Profile
Michael J DeFlorio
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Author Profile
Thomas Corringham
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Author Profile
Alison Cobb
University of California, San Diego
Author Profile
Bin Guan
UCLA
Author Profile
F. Martin Ralph
SIO
Author Profile
Duane Edward Waliser
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Author Profile

Abstract

Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are responsible for the vast majority (approximately 88%) of flood damage in the Western U.S, an annual average of USD$1.1 billion. Here, using historical flood insurance data, we investigate the genesis characteristics of damaging ARs in the Western U.S. ARs exceeding USD$20 million in damage (90th percentile), are shown to travel further across the Pacific Ocean, with median genesis locations 8° to 27° longitude further westward compared to typical ARs. Identifying regions of preferential genesis of damaging ARs elicit important implications for AR observation campaigns, highlighting distant regions not currently considered for AR reconnaissance. The genesis of damaging ARs is associated with elevated upper-level zonal wind speeds along with deeper cyclonic anomalies, most pronounced for Washington and Oregon ARs. Linking AR dynamics and lifecycle characteristics to economic damage provides an opportunity for impact-based forecasting of ARs prior to landfall, supporting efforts to mitigate extreme flood damages.
28 Oct 2021Published in Geophysical Research Letters volume 48 issue 20. 10.1029/2021GL093947