loading page

How well do large-eddy simulations and global climate models represent observed boundary layer structures and low clouds over the summertime Southern Ocean?
  • +4
  • Rachel Atlas,
  • Christopher S. Bretherton,
  • Peter N. Blossey,
  • Andrew Gettelman,
  • Charles Bardeen,
  • Pu Lin,
  • Yi Ming
Rachel Atlas
University of Washington

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Christopher S. Bretherton
University of Washington
Author Profile
Peter N. Blossey
University of Washington
Author Profile
Andrew Gettelman
National Center for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)
Author Profile
Charles Bardeen
National Center for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)
Author Profile
Pu Lin
Princeton University
Author Profile
Yi Ming
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Author Profile

Abstract

Climate models struggle to accurately represent the highly reflective boundary layer clouds overlying the remote and stormy Southern Ocean. We use in-situ aircraft observations from the Southern Ocean Clouds, Radiation and Aerosol Transport Experimental Study (SOCRATES) to evaluate Southern Ocean clouds in a cloud-resolving large-eddy simulation (LES) and two coarse resolution global atmospheric models, the CESM Community Atmosphere Model (CAM6) and the GFDL global atmosphere model (AM4), run in a nudged hindcast framework. We develop six case studies from SOCRATES data which span the range of observed cloud and boundary layer properties. For each case, the LES is run once forced purely using reanalysis data (‘ERA5-based’) and once strongly nudged to an aircraft profile (‘Obs-based’). The ERA5-based LES can be compared with the global models, which are also nudged to reanalysis data, and is better for simulating cumulus. The Obs-based LES closely matches an observed cloud profile and is useful for microphysical comparisons and sensitivity tests, and simulating multi-layer stratiform clouds. We use two-moment Morrison microphysics in the LES and find that it simulates too few frozen particles in clouds occurring within the Hallett-Mossop temperature range. We modify the Hallett-Mossop parameterization so that it activates within boundary layer clouds and we achieve better agreement between observed and simulated microphysics. The nudged GCMs achieve reasonable supercooled liquid water dominated clouds in most cases but struggle to represent multi-layer stratiform clouds and to maintain liquid water in cumulus clouds. CAM6 has low droplet concentrations in all cases and underestimates stratiform cloud-driven turbulence.
Nov 2020Published in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems volume 12 issue 11. 10.1029/2020MS002205