loading page

Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements
  • +13
  • Gabor Facsko,
  • David Gary Sibeck,
  • Ilja Honkonen,
  • József Bór,
  • German FARINAS PEREZ,
  • Anikó Timár,
  • Yuri Shprits,
  • Pyry Lauri Samuli Peitso,
  • Laura Degener,
  • Eija I Tanskanen,
  • Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu,
  • János Kalmár,
  • Szalai Sándor,
  • Arpad Kis,
  • Viktor Wesztergom,
  • Ákos Madár
Gabor Facsko
Wigner Research Centre for Physics

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
David Gary Sibeck
GSFC
Author Profile
Ilja Honkonen
Finnish Meteorological Institute
Author Profile
József Bór
Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science
Author Profile
German FARINAS PEREZ
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Author Profile
Anikó Timár
Wigner Research Centre for Physics
Author Profile
Yuri Shprits
GFZ Helmholtz Center Potsdam
Author Profile
Pyry Lauri Samuli Peitso
Aalto University School of Electrical Engineering
Author Profile
Laura Degener
Finnish Meteorological Institute,
Author Profile
Eija I Tanskanen
Aalto University
Author Profile
Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu
University College London
Author Profile
János Kalmár
Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science
Author Profile
Szalai Sándor
Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science
Author Profile
Arpad Kis
Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences
Author Profile
Viktor Wesztergom
Geodetic and Geophysical Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Ákos Madár
Wigner Research Centre for Physics
Author Profile

Abstract

We compare the predictions of the GUMICS-4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth’s magnetosphere with Cluster SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field (Bz) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the velocity along the Sun-Earth line (Vx), and the plasma density as determined from a top hat plasma spectrometer and the spacecraft’s potential from the electric field instrument. We select intervals in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the magnetosphere where these instruments provided good quality data and the model correctly predicted the region in which the spacecraft is located. We determine the location of the bow shock, the magnetopause and, the neutral sheet from the spacecraft measurements and compare these locations to those predicted by the simulation.
The GUMICS-4 model agrees well with the measurements in the solar wind however its accuracy is worse in the magnetosheath. The simulation results are not realistic in the magnetosphere. The bow shock location is predicted well, however, the magnetopause location is less accurate. The neutral sheet positions are located quite accurately thanks to the special solar wind conditions when the By component of the interplanetary magnetic field is small.