loading page

Impact of roughness length on WRF simulated Land-Atmosphere interactions over a hyper-arid region
  • +10
  • Marouane Temimi,
  • Narendra Reddy Nelli,
  • Ricardo Fonseca,
  • Michael Weston,
  • Mohan S Thota,
  • Vineeth Krishnan valappil,
  • Oliver Branch,
  • Volker Wulfmeyer,
  • Youssef Wehbe,
  • Taha El-Hosary,
  • Abdeltawab Shalaby,
  • Noor Al Shamsi,
  • Hajer Al Naqbi
Marouane Temimi
Khalifa University; Masdar Institute

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Narendra Reddy Nelli
Masdar Institute, Khalifa University of Science and Technology
Author Profile
Ricardo Fonseca
Masdar Institute, Khalifa University of Science and Technology
Author Profile
Michael Weston
Masdar Institute
Author Profile
Mohan S Thota
National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting
Author Profile
Vineeth Krishnan valappil
Masdar Institute, Khalifa University,
Author Profile
Oliver Branch
University of Hohenheim
Author Profile
Volker Wulfmeyer
University of Hohenheim
Author Profile
Youssef Wehbe
Khalifa University
Author Profile
Taha El-Hosary
National Meteorological Service, UAE
Author Profile
Abdeltawab Shalaby
National Meteorological Service, UAE
Author Profile
Noor Al Shamsi
National Meteorological Service, UAE
Author Profile
Hajer Al Naqbi
National Meteorological Service, UAE
Author Profile

Abstract

The aerodynamic roughness length is a crucial parameter that controls surface variables including the horizontal wind, surface temperature, and heat fluxes. Despite its importance, in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, this parameter is typically assigned a predefined value, mostly based on the dominant land-use type. In this work, the roughness length is first estimated from eddy-covariance measurements at Al Ain in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), a hyper-arid region, and then ingested into WRF. The estimated roughness length is in the range 1.3 to 2.2 mm, one order smaller than the default value used in WRF. In line with previous studies, and from WRF model simulations during the warm and cold seasons, it is concluded that, when the roughness length is decreased by an order of magnitude, the horizontal wind speed increases by up to 1 m s, the surface temperature rises by up to 2.5ºC, and the sensible heat flux decreases by as much as 10 W m. In comparison with in situ station and eddy covariance data, and when forced with the updated roughness length, WRF gives more accurate 2-m air temperature and sensible heat flux predictions. For prevailing wind speeds > 6 m s, the model underestimates the strength of the near-surface wind, a tendency that can be partially corrected, typically by 1-3 m s, when the updated roughness length is considered. For low wind speeds (< 4 m s), however, WRF generally overestimates the strength of the wind.