FACILITATING SCIENCE-BASED ADAPTATION THROUGH COMMUNITY-BASED
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED FROM A CASE STUDY IN THE
TRUCKEE-CARSON RIVER SYSTEM
Abstract
In arid snow-fed river systems, where climate change affects snowpack
accumulation and snowmelt timing, community-based participatory research
that engages scientists and stakeholders can shape research agendas to
support local climate adaptation and produce decision-relevant science.
This presentation provides an overview of a community-based
participatory research project underway in the Truckee-Carson River
System in the Western United States. The authors: (1) describe the
participatory research framework developed for this case study which
features an interdisciplinary science team; (2) explain the selection
and role of a diverse group of stakeholders representing diverse water
use communities that regularly interacts with scientists; (3) highlight
selected results of a local climate resiliency assessment and research
activities to date; and (4) share successes and challenges to date
useful to establishing best practices that may guide the replication of
this research framework elsewhere. Our findings indicate that climate
change is mobilizing local adaptation strategies that include
communicating with other water managers, collecting data to monitor
climate impacts, and planning for future water supply variability by
investigating the performance of institutionalized water management
regimes. To guide community decisions and support managers’ science
information needs, researchers are developing stakeholder-informed
climate scenarios and simulating locally identified adaptation
strategies. Best practices identified to date underscore the importance
of early stakeholder engagement to clarify case study boundaries,
prioritize research questions of interest, and identify a core
stakeholder group willing to participate in research. This sets the
stage for a transparent and responsive process, which aids in building
trust in the research design as demonstrated through scientists seeking
and incorporating local knowledge and input. Related to this
transparency is the need to acknowledge power disparities that may exist
among stakeholder communities including historically marginalized groups
with high stakes in sustaining water resources. A thorough stakeholder
analysis should address these considerations and comprises a critical
component of the research design.