Response Manipulation vs Diurnal Observation: A Direct Comparison of Two
Methods for Quantifying Stomatal Behavior in Tropical Forests
Abstract
A primary source of uncertainty in terrestrial biosphere model (TBM)
projection of carbon uptake and water cycling from ecosystems is the
relationship between CO2 assimilation (A) and water loss
via stomatal conductance (gs). A common mathematical
framework for modeling this relationship is the “Unified Stomatal
model”, which relates A to gs over environmental
conditions and is governed by two terms, the stomatal slope
(g1) and intercept (g0). Given their
importance in determining the relationship between forest productivity
and climate, an accurate and mechanistic understanding of the
g1 and g0 parameters is crucial,
particularly in wet tropical broadleaf forests where changes in water
cycling could impact global weather patterns. These stomatal parameters
are estimated using leaf-level gas exchange by two alternative methods:
(1) a response curve where the environmental conditions are modified for
a single leaf, or (2) a survey approach, where repeated measurements are
made on multiple leaves over a diurnal range of environmental
conditions. We compare the curve and survey approaches by conducting a
comprehensive measurement campaign in which we paired diurnal gas
exchange surveys with leaf level response curves for the estimation of
g1 and g0 on six tropical species across
a full range of leaf phenological stages. We examine how these different
estimates impact model projection of gs, and how the
consideration of a diurnal effect on g1 and
g0 can improve predictions relative to a model using
parameter estimates which are fixed over the photoperiod. Our results
showed that age is an important factor to consider in estimates of
g0, however there was no effect of leaf age on estimates
of g1. The survey approach identified a diurnal trend
associated with g1 and g0, which when
accounted for improved model projections of diurnal trends in
gs. We found that while both approaches yield equally
statistically valid estimates of g1 and
g0 at a fixed point in time, they are not directly
comparable across diurnal timescales, where shifting water supply and
carbon demand lead to dynamic canopy scale water use efficiency (WUE).
These results suggest that to improve the accuracy of modelled
gs in tropical forests, TBMs should recognize and
implement diurnal variation in stomatal parameters which are associated
with diurnal shifts in WUE.