Key components and contrasts in the nitrogen budget across a US-Canadian
transboundary watershed
Abstract
Watershed nitrogen (N) budgets provide insights into drivers and
solutions for groundwater and surface water N contamination. We
constructed a comprehensive N budget for the transboundary Nooksack
River Watershed (BC, Canada and WA, US) using locally-derived data,
national statistics and standard parameters. Feed imports for dairy
(mainly in the US) and poultry (mainly in Canada) accounted for 30 and
29% of the total N input to the watershed, respectively. Synthetic
fertilizer was the next largest source contributing 21% of inputs. Food
imports for humans and pets together accounted for 9% of total inputs,
slightly lower than atmospheric deposition (10%). Returning salmon
represented <0.06% of total N input but was an important
ecological flux by importing marine-derived nutrients. Quantified N
export was 80% of total N input, driven by ammonia emission (32% of
exports). Animal product export was the second largest output of N
(31%) as milk and cattle in the US and poultry products in Canada.
Riverine export of N was estimated 28% of total N export. The commonly
used crop nitrogen use efficiency (crop NUE) alone did not provide
sufficient information on farming activities and should be combined with
other criteria such as farm-gate NUE to understand management
efficiency. Agriculture was the primary driver of N inputs to the
environment despite widespread adoption of conservation practices,
illustrating a need to optimize management to minimize hydrologic and
volatilization losses. The N budget provides key information for
stakeholders across sectors and borders to create environmentally and
economically viable and effective solutions.