Low-Cost Sensors Provide Insight into Temporal Variation in Fugitive
Methane Gas Concentrations Around an Energy Well
Abstract
Effective measurement of the presence and rate of methane gas migration
(GM) outside the casing of energy wells is important for managing social
and environmental impacts and financial liabilities in the upstream
petroleum industry. Practitioners typically assess GM by
above-background methane gas concentrations in-soil or at-grade;
however, factors influencing the potential variation in these
measurements are not well represented in industry recommended
best-practices. Inexpensive chemoresistive sensors were used to record a
one-minute frequency methane gas concentration time series over 19 days.
Time series were recorded at three soil depths (0, 5, and 30 cm) at two
locations <30m cm radially from a petroleum well with known
GM, in addition to two ‘control’ locations. Observed concentration
variations ranged over several orders of magnitude at all depths, with
generally lower concentrations and more variation observed at shallower
depths. Varying concentrations were correlated to meteorological
factors, primarily including wind speed and shallow groundwater table
elevation. The gas concentration patterns were affected by a 3.5 mm
rainfall event, suggesting soil moisture changes affected preferential
gas migration pathways. Results indicate potential variability in
repeated snapshot GM test results. Although currently recommended GM
detection methods would have effectively identified the presence/absence
of GM, they would not have quantified order of magnitude changes in
concentration. GM detection success at this site was increased with
measurement at more than one location spatially within 30 cm of the well
casing, lower concentration detection limits, and greater measurement
depth. These findings indicate that meteorological factors should be
considered when conducting gas migration surveys (particularly for
improving at-grade test reliability). The low-cost approach for
long-term concentration measurement facilitates insight into variable
gas concentrations and may be advantageous in comparison to snapshot
measurements in some circumstances.